Low-dose oral contraceptives and acquired resistance to activated protein C: a randomised cross-over study
- PMID: 10636369
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06092-4
Low-dose oral contraceptives and acquired resistance to activated protein C: a randomised cross-over study
Abstract
Background: We have reported previously that, compared with use of second-generation oral contraceptives, the use of third-generation oral contraceptives is associated with increased resistance to the anticoagulant action of activated protein C (APC). Owing to the cross-sectional design of that study, these observations may have been subject to unknown bias or uncontrolled effects of the menstrual cycle. We aimed to overcome these sources of bias by doing a cycle-controlled randomised cross-over trial.
Methods: The response to APC in plasma was assessed in 33 women who received two consecutive cycles of a second-generation oral contraceptive (150 microg levonorgestrel and 30 microg ethinyloestradiol) or a third-generation oral contraceptive (150 microg desogestrel and 30 microg ethinyloestradiol), and who switched preparations after two pill-free cycles. Normalised APC sensitivity ratios were calculated by measurement of the effect of APC on thrombin generation in the plasma of these women and in pooled plasma from 90 controls.
Findings: Of the 33 women, five were excluded because not all required plasma samples were available. In the remaining 28 women, the normalised APC sensitivity ratio increased during treatment with both preparations. Compared with levonorgestrel, desogestrel-containing oral-contraceptive treatment caused a highly significant (p<0.0001) additional increase in normalised APC sensitivity ratio (0.51 [95% CI 0.37-0.66]). Normalised APC sensitivity ratios during oral-contraceptive treatment correlated with the values before oral-contraceptive use.
Interpretation: Oral-contraceptive treatment diminishes the efficacy with which APC down-regulates in-vitro thrombin formation. This phenomenon, designated as acquired APC resistance, is more pronounced in women using desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives than in women using levonorgestrel-containing preparations. Whether acquired APC resistance induced by oral contraceptives explains the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in oral-contraceptive users remains to be established.
PIP: This cycle-controlled randomized cross-over study examined the effects of a second-generation oral contraceptive (OC) containing levonorgestrel and a third-generation OC containing desogestrel on the anticoagulant action of activated protein C (APC) in the plasma. The response to APC in plasma was assessed in 28 women who received two consecutive cycles of a second-generation OC (150 mcg levonorgestrel and 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol) or a third-generation OC (150 mcg desogestrel and 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol), and who switched preparations after two pill-free cycles. Normalized APC sensitivity ratio was also taken from these women. Results showed that in the 28 women the normalized APC sensitivity ratio increased during treatment with both preparations. Compared with levonorgestrel, desogestrel-containing OC treatment caused a highly significant (p 0.0001) additional increase in normalized APC sensitivity ratio (0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.66). In conclusion, OC treatment diminishes the efficacy with which APC down-regulates in-vitro thrombin formation.
Similar articles
-
A randomized cross-over study on the effects of levonorgestrel- and desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives on the anticoagulant pathways.Thromb Haemost. 2000 Jul;84(1):15-21. Thromb Haemost. 2000. PMID: 10928463 Clinical Trial.
-
Population-based study of risk of venous thromboembolism associated with various oral contraceptives.Lancet. 1997 Jan 11;349(9045):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07496-x. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 8996419
-
Relationships between blood pressure, oral contraceptive use and metabolic risk markers for cardiovascular disease.Contraception. 1995 Sep;52(3):143-9. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00153-2. Contraception. 1995. PMID: 7587185
-
Effects of oral contraceptives on hemostasis and thrombosis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;180(6 Pt 2):S375-82. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70699-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10368524 Review.
-
Effects on hemostatic variables of desogestrel- and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives in comparison with levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives: a review.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 2):S51-61. doi: 10.1053/ob.1998.v179.a92633. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9753311 Review.
Cited by
-
Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms.Drugs. 2000 Oct;60(4):721-869. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060040-00003. Drugs. 2000. PMID: 11085198 Review.
-
Lower risk of cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women taking oral estradiol compared with oral conjugated equine estrogens.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):25-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11074. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24081194 Free PMC article.
-
Estradiol Therapy in the Perioperative Period: Implications for Transgender People Undergoing Feminizing Hormone Therapy.Yale J Biol Med. 2020 Sep 30;93(4):539-548. eCollection 2020 Sep. Yale J Biol Med. 2020. PMID: 33005118 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacokinetics of inhaled nanotherapeutics for pulmonary delivery.J Control Release. 2020 Oct 10;326:222-244. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 16. J Control Release. 2020. PMID: 32681948 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular events associated with different combined oral contraceptives: a review of current data.Drug Saf. 2000 May;22(5):361-71. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200022050-00004. Drug Saf. 2000. PMID: 10830253 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources