Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Feb;68(2):150-6.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.2.150.

Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis

J A Freeman et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding the properties of an outcome measure is essential in choosing the appropriate instrument and interpreting the information it generates. The MOS 36 item short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) is widely acknowledged as the gold standard generic measure of health status; few studies however have evaluated its use for clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. Its clinical appropriateness, internal consistency reliability, validity, and responsiveness was investigated across a broad range of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Methods: A prospective study in which 150 adults with clinically definite multiple sclerosis completed a battery of questionnaires evaluating generic health status, disability, handicap, and emotional wellbeing. Of these, 44 patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation completed the questionnaires before and after intervention to evaluate responsiveness.

Results: Score distributions demonstrated significant floor and ceiling effects in four of the eight dimensions which were particularly marked when patient selection was restricted to a narrow band of disease severity (as is the case in most clinical trials). Internal consistency exceeded the standard for group comparisons for all dimensions. Convergent and discriminant construct validity was supported by the direction, magnitude, and pattern of correlations with other health measures. In comparison with instruments measuring associated constructs, the responsiveness of the SF-36 was poor in evaluating change in moderate to severely disabled patients participating in a programme of inpatient rehabilitation.

Conclusions: The SF-36 has some limitations as an outcome measure in multiple sclerosis. The results highlight the need for all instruments to be examined in the specific sample population under question and for the specific research question being investigated. In multiple sclerosis clinical trials, the SF-36 should be supplemented with other relevant measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Oct;71(11):870-5 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1997 Aug;6(6):561-71 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol. 1996 Jun;243(6):469-74 - PubMed
    1. Ann Neurol. 1996 Mar;39(3):285-94 - PubMed
    1. Qual Life Res. 1995 Jun;4(3):187-206 - PubMed

Publication types