Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jan;82(2):263-9.
doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913.

Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer

C Roberge et al. Br J Cancer. 2000 Jan.

Abstract

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre François Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H&N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P < 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. One third of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S217-32 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1994 Mar;12(3):608-16 - PubMed
    1. Head Neck. 1990 Mar-Apr;12(2):137-42 - PubMed
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Mar-Apr;14(2):173-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jan;66(1):148-51 - PubMed

Publication types