The effect of the "floating mass transducer" in the middle ear on hearing sensitivity
- PMID: 10651434
The effect of the "floating mass transducer" in the middle ear on hearing sensitivity
Abstract
Objective: The Vibrant soundbridge is a semi-implantable hearing device; the transducer is implanted, coupled directly to the incus. The influence of the implant surgery and the presence of the transducer on hearing sensitivity was studied in six implanted subjects.
Study design: Longitudinal case reports.
Setting: Tertiary referral center. Subjects. The subjects had bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with an average hearing loss of 40 to 70 dB HL.
Results: In five of the six subjects, no long-term effect of the surgery or the presence of the transducer on hearing thresholds was found. In the remaining subject, a deterioration in hearing thresholds was found of 20 dB, with a high and low frequency component. In the 2-kHz region, hearing sensitivity was not deteriorated. In addition, chronic negative middle ear pressure occurred after surgery.
Conclusion: Hearing thresholds did not change significantly in five of the six patients after placement of the "floating mass transducer." It was speculated that the high frequency component of the hearing deterioration in the remaining patient was caused by cochlear damage caused by the surgery and that the low frequency component was caused by the chronic aeration problems indirectly related to the surgery.
Similar articles
-
Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(2):83-8. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009. PMID: 19813469
-
Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):609-14. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318043014c. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17514064
-
A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(4):247-56. doi: 10.1159/000115434. Epub 2008 Feb 7. Audiol Neurootol. 2008. PMID: 18259077 Clinical Trial.
-
Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1040-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a9816. Otol Neurotol. 2011. PMID: 21844783 Review.
-
A prospective case-controlled study of 197 men, 50-60 years old, selected at random from a population at risk from hyperlipidaemia to examine the relationship between hyperlipidaemia and sensorineural hearing loss.Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999 Sep;24(5):449-56. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00294.x. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999. PMID: 10542930 Review.
Cited by
-
ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE SOUND IMPLANT.Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(2):348-353. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.20. Acta Clin Croat. 2019. PMID: 31819333 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A longitudinal study on postoperative hearing thresholds with the Vibrant Soundbridge device.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Oct;261(9):493-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0669-9. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004. PMID: 15004703
-
The vibrant® soundbridge™.Trends Amplif. 2002 Jun;6(2):67-72. doi: 10.1177/108471380200600207. Trends Amplif. 2002. PMID: 25425914 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous