Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis
- PMID: 10652503
- DOI: 10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00214-3
Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis
Abstract
The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease (EFFO), the Royal College of Physicians, the European Community and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (NOF) have recently published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. All adopt case-finding strategies but the conceptual approach between the European and North American guidelines differs fundamentally. This gives rise to differences in the populations identified for assessment and treatment.
Similar articles
-
Osteoporosis: therapeutic guidelines. Guidelines for practice management of osteoporosis.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;56(4):694-702. doi: 10.1097/01.grf.0000437016.19989.61. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24177062 Review.
-
Osteoporosis Management in a Real Clinical Setting: Heterogeneity in Intervention Approach and Discrepancy in Treatment Rates when Compared with the NOGG and NOF Guidelines.Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 Sep;124(8):466-473. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107671. Epub 2016 May 24. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016. PMID: 27219881 Clinical Trial.
-
Harmonization of clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia in Europe: a difficult challenge.Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59 Suppl 1:S24-9. doi: 10.1007/s002239900172. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996. PMID: 8974726 Review.
-
Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk in Poland of III Central European Congress on Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, XV Congress of the Polish Osteoarthrology Society and Polish Foundation of Osteoporosis.Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;12(2):194-200. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20821886 English, Polish. No abstract available.
-
Disparate outcomes from applying U.K. and U.S. osteoporosis treatment guidelines.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1856-60. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2157. Epub 2010 Feb 10. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010. PMID: 20147581 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Clinical utility of laboratory testing in women with osteoporosis.Osteoporos Int. 2005 May;16(5):534-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1718-y. Epub 2004 Aug 31. Osteoporos Int. 2005. PMID: 15340801
-
An audit of bone densitometry practice with reference to ISCD, IOF and NOF guidelines.Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(7):1111-5. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0101-6. Epub 2006 May 3. Osteoporos Int. 2006. PMID: 16758146
-
The utility and limitations of FRAX: A US perspective.Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010 Dec;8(4):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s11914-010-0032-1. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2010. PMID: 20811963 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison of case-finding strategies in the UK for the management of hip fractures.Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):907-15. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1864-y. Epub 2012 Jan 11. Osteoporos Int. 2012. PMID: 22234810
-
Identifying and managing patients at high risk for fractures: conclusions from the second Spanish multidisciplinary forum-parathyroid hormone use in osteoporotic patients at high risk for fractures.Drugs R D. 2012 Dec 1;12(4):199-206. doi: 10.2165/11641360-000000000-00000. Drugs R D. 2012. PMID: 23193980 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical