Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study
- PMID: 10654456
- DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90999-9
Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study
Abstract
The optimal technique for acetabular revision surgery in the face of major bone stock deficiency remains controversial. One subset of these problem cases consists of hips that are amenable to reconstruction using a large, hemispherical cementless acetabular component, the so-called jumbo acetabular component. We report the intermediate-term experience of 24 hips in 24 patients who underwent an uncemented acetabular revision using a hemispherical acetabular component of > or = 66 mm diameter. In 16 hips, the femoral component was replaced as well. Of the 18 hips in patients alive after 5 years, 15 were assessed at a mean follow-up of 7.0 years (range, 5.0-10.3 years). The mean final Harris Hip Score was 86 points (range, 45-100 points). No acetabular component had been revised, and none were loose radiographically. In this difficult group, a bimodal distribution resulted. The complication rate was high. In those without infection, the results were excellent.
Similar articles
-
High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Apr;81(4):469-80. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00004. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10225792
-
Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18;97(4):284-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00798. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015. PMID: 25695978
-
Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Aug;82(8):1146-53. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200008000-00012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000. PMID: 10954105
-
Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Feb;81(2):247-55. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199902000-00012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 10073588
-
Jumbo cups and morsalized graft.Orthop Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;29(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70323-0. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9553570 Review.
Cited by
-
Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups.Orthop Surg. 2019 Oct;11(5):811-818. doi: 10.1111/os.12522. Epub 2019 Sep 24. Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 31549788 Free PMC article.
-
Can porous tantalum acetabular cups and augments restore the hip centre of rotation in revision hip arthroplasty? Long-term results.Acta Biomed. 2022 Mar 10;92(S3):e2021549. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.12398. Acta Biomed. 2022. PMID: 35604256 Free PMC article.
-
Extended Fixation for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years.Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):205-213. doi: 10.1111/os.13577. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36419313 Free PMC article.
-
Impaction bone grafting for contained acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 11;18(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04154-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37697375 Free PMC article.
-
Major acetabular defects: outcomes of first revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull cross-plate with allograft and cemented dual mobility cup at a maximum follow-up of fourteen years.Int Orthop. 2022 Nov;46(11):2539-2546. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05556-1. Epub 2022 Aug 30. Int Orthop. 2022. PMID: 36038654
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical