Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Nov;53(11):710-5.
doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.710.

Short-term impact of a university based smoke free campaign

Affiliations

Short-term impact of a university based smoke free campaign

J F Etter et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Study objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a smoke free programme implemented at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, in 1996. This programme included a prohibition to smoke in university buildings everywhere except in limited areas, and a smoking cessation counselling service.

Methods: Surveys were conducted before and four months after the programme was implemented, in representative samples of programme participants (n = 833) and university members not exposed to the programme (n = 1023).

Results: In retrospective assessments, participants reported being less bothered by environmental tobacco smoke after programme implementation, but no between group difference was detected in prospective assessments. Relationships between smokers and non-smokers improved moderately in the intervention group and remained unchanged in the comparison group (between group p = 0.001). Proportions of smokers who attempted to quit smoking in the past four months increased from 2.0% to 3.8% in the intervention group and remained unchanged at 3.5% in the comparison group (between group difference: p = 0.048). No impact on smoking prevalence (25%) was detected. The programme was appreciated by university members, although some of its modalities were criticised.

Conclusion: A regulation prohibiting smoking everywhere but in limited areas of university buildings was acceptable and reduced the perception of bother by environmental tobacco smoke. It did not, however, influence smoking habits or attitudes toward smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Every step counts: towards a smoke free society.
    Villalbí JR. Villalbí JR. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):686. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.686. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999. PMID: 10656096 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jan;111(1):23-41 - PubMed
    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 May;48(5):1279-89 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1992 Sep;21(5):670-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):872-80 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 1993 May;22(3):388-99 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances