Competing interests and controversy about third generation oral contraceptives. BMJ readers should know whose words they read
- PMID: 10657348
- PMCID: PMC1127158
Competing interests and controversy about third generation oral contraceptives. BMJ readers should know whose words they read
Comment on
-
The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills.BMJ. 1999 Sep 25;319(7213):795-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7213.795. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10496802 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Vandenbroucke JP. Medical journals and the shaping of medical knowledge. Lancet. 1998;352:2001–2006. - PubMed
-
- Walker AM. Newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism. Contraception. 1998;57:169–181. - PubMed
-
- Lewis MA, MacRae KD, Kühl-Habich D, Bruppacher R, Heinnemann LAJ, Spitzer WO. The differential risk of oral contraceptives: the impact of full exposure history. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1493–1499. - PubMed
-
- WHO Scientific Group on Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormonal Contraception. Cardiovascular disease and steroid hormone contraception: report of a WHO scientific group. WHO Tech Rep Ser 1988;No 877.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources