Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Jan 3;852(1):140-50.
doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02227-1.

Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise

B Büki et al. Brain Res. .

Abstract

The medial olivocochlear efferent bundle is the key element of a bilateral efferent reflex activated by sound in either ear and acting directly on cochlear outer hair cells (OHC) via numerous cholinergic synapses. It probably contributes to regulating the mechanical activity of the cochlea. Otoacoustic emissions, being sounds emitted by the cochlea as a reflection of its activity and suppressed by efferent activation, are increasingly considered to be the privileged tool for a noninvasive assessment of the efferent reflex. However, confounding effects on otoacoustic emissions can occur. A primary influence is middle-ear muscle reflex activation, which shares common features with the effects of cochlear efferent activation. We report a systematic comparison of the responses of human otoacoustic emissions to efferent activation by low-level noise in the contralateral ear to various middle-ear manipulations (reflex contractions of the stapedius muscle induced by high-level contralateral noise; moderate middle-ear pressure changes). The profiles of level and phase changes of otoacoustic emissions as a function of frequency were highly specific to the origin of the effects. The changes induced by middle-ear manipulations matched the predictions computed from a standard lumped-element middle-ear model, with one or two peaks around the resonance frequency(ies) of the involved subsystem, stapes or tympanic membrane. In contrast, the efferent effect was completely different, exhibiting a broadband-level suppression associated with a small phase lead. We propose that a careful vector analysis of otoacoustic emission modifications enables the identification of the contribution of the efferent reflex without ambiguity even when it is mixed with middle-ear effects. Thereby, otoacoustic emissions can be used more reliably as noninvasive probes of efferent olivocochlear function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources