Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Nov;16(5 Pt 2):563-76.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916050-00012.

Economic impact of providing workplace influenza vaccination. A model and case study application at a Brazilian pharma-chemical company

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Economic impact of providing workplace influenza vaccination. A model and case study application at a Brazilian pharma-chemical company

E Burckel et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and apply a model to assess the economic value of a workplace influenza programme from the perspective of the employer.

Design: The model calculated the avoided costs of influenza, including treatment costs, lost productivity, lost worker added value and the cost of replacing workers. Subtracted from this benefit were the costs associated with a vaccination programme, including administrative costs, the time to give the vaccine, and lost productivity due to adverse reactions. The framework of the model can be applied to any company to estimate the cost-benefit of an influenza immunisation programme.

Setting: The model developed was applied to 4030 workers in the core divisions of a Brazilian pharma-chemical company.

Results: The model determined a net benefit of $US121,441 [129,335 Brazilian reals ($Brz)], or $US35.45 ($Brz37.75) per vaccinated employee (1997 values). The cost-benefit ratio was 1:2.47. The calculations were subjected to a battery of 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses that determined that net benefit would be retained as long as the vaccine cost remained below $US45.40 ($Brz48.40) or the vaccine was at least 32.5% effective. Other alterations would retain a net benefit as well, including several combinations of incidence rate and vaccine effectiveness.

Conclusions: The analysis suggests that providing an influenza vaccination programme can incur a substantial net benefit for an employer, although the size of the benefit will depend upon who normally absorbs the costs of treating influenza and compensating workers for lost work time due to illness, as well as the type of company in which the immunisation programme is applied.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1973 Nov;98(5):365-80 - PubMed
    1. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10 Suppl:31-44 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1993 Dec;83(12):1712-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1970 Oct;92(4):248-56 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jun;121(6):811-22 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources