Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Jan;27(1):1-10.

Current status of burn resuscitation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10665352
Review

Current status of burn resuscitation

C J Yowler et al. Clin Plast Surg. 2000 Jan.

Abstract

Rapid assessment and management of airway and breathing problems are required in the patient with severe burns complicated by significant facial burns and inhalation injury. A policy that results in intubation of all patients at potential risk for airway compromise can be both foolish and dangerous. At the same time, it is recognized that intubation of patients who are likely to develop unstable airways is necessary if transport times to burn centers are long and if i.v. resuscitation is initiated during transport. The ideal burn resuscitation formula does not exist. Whichever formula is used, patients must be monitored closely and the fluid resuscitation individualized according to their responses. Patients with delay in resuscitation, associated trauma, inhalation injury, or alcohol abuse may require fluid resuscitations greater than those predicted. The goal is to maintain urine outputs in the range of 0.5 to 1 mL/kg/hr for adults and 1 to 1.5 mL/kg/hr in children. In patients with fluid requirements greater than 150% of that predicted by formula, the addition of colloid at 12 hours can reduce total fluid requirements and burn edema. Early placement of pulmonary artery catheters can be useful in patients with known myocardial dysfunction, age greater than 65 years, severe inhalation injury, or fluid requirements greater than 150% of that predicted by formula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources