Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women
- PMID: 10669125
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1007673531595
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and correlation of clinical to Gram stain diagnostic criteria in low risk pregnant women
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis, and the correlation of clinical Amsel criteria with Gram Nugent criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a low risk population of pregnant women. Pregnant women under 28 weeks of gestation who were followed in the low risk clinics at two centers were evaluated for the presence of bacterial vaginosis using the Amsel clinical criteria, and underwent vaginal samples for Gram staining. Gram smears were examined for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on the basis of Nugent's criteria. A total of 492 women were included in the study. Bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 1.6% (8/492) women on the basis of clinical criteria, and in 4.5% (22/492) according to Gram stain. The sensitivity and specificity of Amsel criteria compared with Gram stain were 35% and 99%, respectively. In accordance with other recent reports, the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis appears to be much lower in certain areas than figures previously suggested. In these populations, the correlation of composite clinical criteria defined in groups with high prevalence of bacterial vaginosis appears to be also poor.
Similar articles
-
Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):573-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00233-5. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8841221
-
Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in cases of abnormal vaginal discharge: comparison of clinical and microbiological criteria.J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011 May 28;5(5):353-60. doi: 10.3855/jidc.1153. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011. PMID: 21628811
-
[Evaluation of Nugent and Amsel criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis].Rev Med Chil. 2000 Jul;128(7):767-71. Rev Med Chil. 2000. PMID: 11050838 Spanish.
-
[Bacterial vaginosis and spontaneous preterm birth].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Dec;45(10):1247-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016. PMID: 27793493 Review. French.
-
Evidence on the benefits and harms of screening and treating pregnant women who are asymptomatic for bacterial vaginosis: an update review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):220-33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18252684 Review.
Cited by
-
Utility of Amsel criteria, Nugent score, and quantitative PCR for Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Lactobacillus spp. for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women.J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Sep;43(9):4607-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4607-4612.2005. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16145114 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative gram stain interpretation criteria used by microbiology laboratories in Alberta, Canada.J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4266-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4266-4268.2000. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. PMID: 11060107 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in Portuguese pregnant women and vaginal colonization by Gardnerella vaginalis.PeerJ. 2017 Aug 29;5:e3750. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3750. eCollection 2017. PeerJ. 2017. PMID: 28875084 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical and gram stain diagnosis methods of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in ethiopia.J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Dec;7(12):2701-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5872.3736. Epub 2013 Dec 15. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013. PMID: 24551617 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial Vaginosis and Post-Operative Pelvic Infections.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;11(9):1218. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091218. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174760 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical