Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Feb 12;320(7232):407-12.

Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study

S Hall  1 , M Bobrow, T M Marteau
Affiliations

Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study

S Hall et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the psychological consequences for parents of children with Down's syndrome of having received a false negative result on prenatal screening.

Design: Comparison of adjustment of parents who received a false negative result with that of parents not offered a test and those who declined a test.

Setting: Parents were interviewed in their own homes.

Participants: Parents of 179 children with Down's syndrome (mean age 4 (range 2-6) years).

Main outcome measures: Anxiety, depression, parenting stress, attitudes towards the child, and attributions of blame for the birth of the affected child.

Results: Overall, regardless of screening history, parents adjusted well to having a child with Down's syndrome. Compared with mothers who declined a test, mothers in the false negative group had higher parenting stress (mean score 81.2 v 71.8, P=0.016, 95% confidence interval for the difference 1.8 to 17.0) and more negative attitudes towards their children (124.9 v 134.2, P=0. 009, -16.2 to -2.4). Fathers in the false negative group had higher parenting stress test scores (77.8 v 70.0, P=0.046, 1.5 to 14.2) than fathers not offered a test. Mothers in the false negative group were more likely to blame others for the outcome than mothers who had not been offered the test (28% v 13%, P=0.032, 3% to 27%). Mothers and fathers in the false negative group were more likely to blame others for this outcome than parents who had declined a test (mothers 28% v 0%, P=0.001, 19% to 37%; fathers 27% v 0%, P=0.004, 17% to 38%). Blaming others was associated with poorer adjustment for mothers and fathers.

Conclusions: A false negative result on prenatal screening seems to have a small adverse effect on parental adjustment evident two to six years after the birth of an affected child.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Recruitment of parents and flow through study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Petticrew M, Sowden AJ, Lister-Sharp D. False negative results in screening programmes: impact and implications. Health Technol Assess (in press). - PubMed
    1. Wald NJ, Huttly WJ, Hennessy CF. Down's syndrome screening in the UK in 1998. Lancet. 1999;354:1264. - PubMed
    1. Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J Med Screen. 1997;4:181–246. - PubMed
    1. Snijders RJM, Noble P, Sebire N, Souka A, Nicolaides KH. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks' gestation. Lancet. 1998;352:343–346. - PubMed
    1. The right to a perfect baby. Independent 1992 August 22:3.

Publication types