Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Feb;214(2):381-6.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe01381.

Vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with contrast-enhanced second-harmonic versus conventional power Doppler US

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment with contrast-enhanced second-harmonic versus conventional power Doppler US

B I Choi et al. Radiology. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare contrast material-enhanced harmonic power Doppler ultrasonography (US) with conventional power Doppler US in depicting the vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods: Twenty patients with nodular HCCs (2.6-13.2 cm in diameter; mean diameter, 4.8 cm) were prospectively examined with both conventional and harmonic power Doppler US. US was performed with a 2-4-MHz curved linear-array transducer according to a standard examination protocol (1,000-Hz pulse repetition frequency, medium wall filter, and power gain of 55%-84% for conventional power Doppler US; 700-Hz pulse repetition frequency, low wall filter, and power gain of 95%-98% for harmonic power Doppler US). Serial, dynamic scans were obtained before intravenous injection of the contrast agent (SH U 508A) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 300 seconds after injection with both techniques.

Results: The number of intratumoral power Doppler US signals was similar with both techniques at 30-90 seconds after contrast agent injection; however, after 90 seconds, conventional power Doppler US depicted significantly more signals than did harmonic power Doppler US. Harmonic power Doppler US was superior to conventional power Doppler US in terms of power Doppler artifacts such as "blooming" or motion-related artifacts.

Conclusion: Although the effective enhancement duration is relatively short compared with that for conventional power Doppler US, contrast-enhanced harmonic power Doppler US can be effective in evaluating the vascularity of HCCs because of the advantage of fewer power Doppler artifacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms