Litigation in Canada against anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia. A review of closed claims
- PMID: 10674502
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03018844
Litigation in Canada against anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia. A review of closed claims
Abstract
Purpose: To review the pattern of malpractice litigation related to regional anesthesia in Canada.
Source: The Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) provided with information about all anesthesia claims that closed in the years 1990-1997.
Principal findings: In the period 1990-97 there were 7,909 closed legal actions involving all CMPA members (56,000). Of these, there were 310 cases involving anesthesiologists, of which 61 cases (approximately 20%) were related to regional anesthesia. Forty-two involved neuraxial blocks, and the legal outcome was favourable (dismissed or judgement in favour of the defendant doctor) in 37 claims. Nineteen claims involved peripheral nerve blocks. All these had favourable legal outcomes. Overall, 10% of regional anesthesia claims have unfavourable outcomes, compared with 28% of all anesthesia related claims and 30% of all CMPA members' claims. The degree of disability in the regional anesthesia claims were: none 10%; minor 49%; major 36%; catastrophic 5%. There were no deaths in the malpractice claims involving regional anesthesia, compared with 17% in the all anesthesia group and 11% in all members' claims.
Conclusion: Twenty percent of all anesthesia claims in Canada are related to regional anesthesia. The legal outcome of these claims is favourable in 90%. Unfavourable clinical outcome is associated with catastrophic or major injury. There were no deaths in the regional anesthesia claims.
Similar articles
-
A Contemporary Analysis of Medicolegal Issues in Obstetric Anesthesia Between 2005 and 2015.Anesth Analg. 2019 Jun;128(6):1199-1207. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003395. Anesth Analg. 2019. PMID: 31094788
-
Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007.Anaesthesia. 2010 May;65(5):443-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06248.x. Anaesthesia. 2010. PMID: 20522029
-
What Adverse Events and Injuries Are Cited in Anesthesia Malpractice Claims for Nonspine Orthopaedic Surgery?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2941-2951. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5303-z. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28255948 Free PMC article.
-
Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness.Can J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;54(3):227-41. doi: 10.1007/BF03022645. Can J Anaesth. 2007. PMID: 17331936 Review.
-
Closed claims studies in anesthesia: a literature review and implications for practice.AANA J. 2007 Aug;75(4):267-75. AANA J. 2007. PMID: 17711157 Review.
Cited by
-
Chronic pain practice by consultant anaesthetists in the Republic of Ireland.Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Jun;180(2):407-15. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0625-9. Epub 2010 Dec 21. Ir J Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 21174167
-
The Ecology of Defensive Medicine and Malpractice Litigation.PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150523. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26982056 Free PMC article.
-
Serious complications related to regional anaesthesia: Study of Greek Courts' Decisions.Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(2):109-113. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.129302. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023. PMID: 37587880 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources