Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin
- PMID: 10675382
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.4.328
Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin
Abstract
Background: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) given as unopposed estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) gained widespread popularity in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s. Recent prescribing practices have favored combination HRT (CHRT), i.e., adding a progestin to estrogen for the entire monthly cycle (continuous combined replacement therapy [CCRT]) or a part of the cycle (sequential estrogen plus progestin therapy [SEPRT]). Few data exist on the association between CHRT and breast cancer risk. We determined the effects of CHRT on a woman's risk of developing breast cancer in a population-based, case-control study.
Methods: Case subjects included those with incident breast cancers diagnosed over 4(1/2) years in Los Angeles County, CA, in the late 1980s and 1990s. Control subjects were neighborhood residents who were individually matched to case subjects on age and race. Case subjects and control subjects were interviewed in person to collect information on known breast cancer risk factors as well as on HRT use. Information on 1897 postmenopausal case subjects and on 1637 postmenopausal control subjects aged 55-72 years who had not undergone a simple hysterectomy was analyzed. Breast cancer risks associated with the various types of HRT were estimated as odds ratios (ORs) after adjusting simultaneously for the different forms of HRT and for known risk factors of breast cancer. All P values are two-sided.
Results: HRT was associated with a 10% higher breast cancer risk for each 5 years of use (OR(5) = 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.18). Risk was substantially higher for CHRT use (OR(5) = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.07-1.45) than for ERT use (OR(5) = 1. 06; 95% CI = 0.97-1.15). Risk estimates were higher for SEPRT (OR(5) = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.13-1.68) than for CCRT (OR(5) = 1.09; 95% CI = 0. 88-1.35), but this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence that the addition of a progestin to HRT enhances markedly the risk of breast cancer relative to estrogen use alone. These findings have important implications for the risk-benefit equation for HRT in women using CHRT.
Comment in
-
Re: Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 5;92(13):1100-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.13.1100. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000. PMID: 10880556 No abstract available.
-
More about: effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 19;92(14):1183-4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1183. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000. PMID: 10904095 No abstract available.
-
Re: effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Dec 6;92(23):1950-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.23.1950. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000. PMID: 11106695 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Progestins and menopause: epidemiological studies of risks of endometrial and breast cancer.Steroids. 2000 Oct-Nov;65(10-11):659-64. doi: 10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00122-7. Steroids. 2000. PMID: 11108873
-
Relation of regimens of combined hormone replacement therapy to lobular, ductal, and other histologic types of breast carcinoma.Cancer. 2002 Dec 15;95(12):2455-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10984. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12467057
-
Estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and endometrial cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Aug 6;89(15):1110-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.15.1110. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997. PMID: 9262248
-
Hormone replacement therapy and cancer.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001 Dec;15(6):453-65. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001. PMID: 11826770 Review.
-
Controversial issues in climacteric medicine II. Hormone replacement therapy and cancer. International Menopause Society Expert Workshop. 9-12 June 2001, Opera del Duomo, Pisa, Italy.Climacteric. 2001 Sep;4(3):181-93. Climacteric. 2001. PMID: 11588941 Review.
Cited by
-
Alcohol and breast cancer risk among Asian-American women in Los Angeles County.Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 27;14(6):R151. doi: 10.1186/bcr3363. Breast Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 23185976 Free PMC article.
-
Cell Fate Decisions During Breast Cancer Development.J Dev Biol. 2016 Mar 1;4(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jdb4010004. Epub 2016 Jan 22. J Dev Biol. 2016. PMID: 27110512 Free PMC article.
-
Isoamericanoic Acid B from Acer tegmentosum as a Potential Phytoestrogen.Nutrients. 2018 Dec 4;10(12):1915. doi: 10.3390/nu10121915. Nutrients. 2018. PMID: 30518114 Free PMC article.
-
Hormonal replacement therapy.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002 Sep;3(3):243-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1020028510797. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002. PMID: 12215719 Review. No abstract available.
-
Female breast cancer incidence predisposing risk factors identification using nationwide big data: a matched nested case-control study in Taiwan.BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09913-6. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35927682 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical