Similar articles

• [Misconduct in biomedical research].

  de Jong JW. de Jong JW. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Jul 10;137(28):1408-13. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993. PMID: 8345896 Dutch. No abstract available.
• Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?

  Berg AO. Berg AO. Fam Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;22(2):137-42. Fam Med. 1990. PMID: 2182360
• Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues.

  Davidhizar R, Newman Giger J. Davidhizar R, et al. Nurse Author Ed. 2002 Summer;12(3):1-4. Nurse Author Ed. 2002. PMID: 12092429 Review.
• Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.

  Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Maturitas. 2009 Mar 20;62(3):208-24. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Feb 7. Maturitas. 2009. PMID: 19329007 No abstract available.
• Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?

  Claxton LD. Claxton LD. Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003. Mutat Res. 2005. PMID: 15652224 Review.