Rationale for intergroup trial E-3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and DTIC alone in patients with metastatic melanoma
- PMID: 10685653
Rationale for intergroup trial E-3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, and DTIC alone in patients with metastatic melanoma
Abstract
Purpose: The modest activity of chemotherapy and biologic agents in the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma has prompted investigators to consider combinations of chemotherapy and biologic agents (i.e., biochemotherapy) as a way of improving response rates and survival. Although biochemotherapy has generated a great deal of interest over the last several years, and these regimens have produced high response rates in single-institution phase II trials, they have yet to demonstrate a significant survival benefit in randomized trials compared with either chemotherapy or biotherapy alone.
Methods: The available literature regarding the clinical experience with single- and multiagent chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and biochemotherapy was reviewed.
Results: Treatment of metastatic melanoma with either single-agent or combination chemotherapy regimens is clearly suboptimal; the majority of responses are partial and of short duration. In contrast, interleukin (IL)-2 produces long-term durable complete remission in a subset of patients. Over 1,000 patients have been treated with IL-2-based biochemotherapy regimens in single-institution phase II trials, and response rates have ranged from 40% to 60%. Most encouraging have been the durable responses observed in 10% to 20% of patients in most of these trials. Large databases, including two meta-analyses, have confirmed the substantial improvement in response rate associated with biochemotherapy regimens that include both IL-2 and interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) compared with chemotherapy or biotherapy alone. Biochemotherapy is currently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials to determine if this treatment strategy can provide a survival benefit compared with current standard treatments. A pilot study at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has demonstrated the feasibility of administering a modification of a concurrent biochemotherapy regimen, initially described by Legha et al, consisting of cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD) plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha in the cooperative group setting.
Conclusion: These studies provided the rationale for intergroup trial E-3695, which is currently randomizing patients to concurrent biochemotherapy with CVD plus IL-2 and IFN-alpha versus CVD alone.
Similar articles
-
Combination of chemotherapy with interleukin-2 and interferon-alfa for the treatment of advanced melanoma.Semin Oncol. 1994 Dec;21(6 Suppl 14):23-8. Semin Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7992096 Review.
-
Development and results of biochemotherapy in metastatic melanoma: the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.Cancer J Sci Am. 1997 Dec;3 Suppl 1:S9-15. Cancer J Sci Am. 1997. PMID: 9457387 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase II multicenter trial of maintenance biotherapy after induction concurrent Biochemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6207-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3075. Epub 2009 Nov 16. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19917850 Clinical Trial.
-
Biochemotherapy of melanoma.Forum (Genova). 2003;13(2):158-65; quiz 189. Forum (Genova). 2003. PMID: 14732882 Review.
-
Dacarbazine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Mar;19(1):21-34. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000. PMID: 10840932
Cited by
-
Magnetic nanoparticles in theranostics of malignant melanoma.EJNMMI Res. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13550-021-00868-6. EJNMMI Res. 2021. PMID: 34905138 Free PMC article. Review.