Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000;78(1):42-54.

Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy

Affiliations
Review

Defining and measuring health inequality: an approach based on the distribution of health expectancy

E E Gakidou et al. Bull World Health Organ. 2000.

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach to conceptualizing and operationalizing the measurement of health inequality, defined as differences in health across individuals in the population. We propose that health is an intrinsic component of well-being and thus we should be concerned with inequality in health, whether or not it is correlated with inequality in other dimensions of well-being. In the measurement of health inequality, the complete range of fatal and non-fatal health outcomes should be incorporated. This notion is operationalized through the concept of healthy lifespan. Individual health expectancy is preferable, as a measurement, to individual healthy lifespan, since health expectancy excludes those differences in healthy lifespan that are simply due to chance. In other words, the quantity of interest for studying health inequality is the distribution of health expectancy across individuals in the population. The inequality of the distribution of health expectancy can be summarized by measures of individual/mean differences (differences between the individual and the mean of the population) or inter-individual differences. The exact form of the measure to summarize inequality depends on three normative choices. A firmer understanding of people's views on these normative choices will provide a basis for deliberating on a standard WHO measure of health inequality.

PIP: This paper proposes an approach to conceptualize and operationalize the measurement of health inequality, defined as differences in health across individuals in the population. The approach is based on four key notions. First, health is an intrinsic component of well-being; thus, inequality in health should be a concern, whether or not it is correlated with inequality in other dimensions of well-being. Second, in the measurement of health inequality, complete range of fatal and non-fatal health outcomes should be incorporated. Third, the quantity of interest for studying health inequality is the distribution of health expectancy across individuals in the population. Lastly, the inequality of distribution of health expectancy can be summarized by measures of individual/mean differences or interindividual differences. The exact form of the measure to summarize inequality depends on three normative choices. A firmer understanding of people's views with regard to these normative choices will provide a basis for discussion of a standard WHO measure of health inequality.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources