Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Mar;182(6):1459-71.
doi: 10.1128/JB.182.6.1459-1471.2000.

Signaling components in bacterial locomotion and sensory reception

Affiliations
Review

Signaling components in bacterial locomotion and sensory reception

S I Aizawa et al. J Bacteriol. 2000 Mar.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Schematic representation of the protein interactions and covalent modification during chemotaxis in enteric bacteria. Chemoeffector binding or release from the transmembrane MCP signal transducers results in a transmembrane conformational change that alters the activity of the CheA protein kinase and the susceptibility of the MCP protein to methylation or demethylation. Phosphorylated CheA can donate the phosphate to CheY, and P-CheY interacts with FliM in the flagellar basal body to influence the direction of flagellar rotation. (Figure provided by Jayna Ditta and Caroline Harwood.)
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Structure of the heme-binding PAS domain from the FixL protein of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. (Left) A ribbons diagram with α-helices in blue and β-sheets in red. The helix pointing up leads to the HK domain. The heme moiety, with the heme iron in green, and its axial histidine ligand are shown. (Right) A comparison of the structures of the FixL heme-binding PAS domain in red and the PAS domain of the photoactive yellow protein PYP in yellow. The locations of the heme moiety of FixL, with the heme iron in green, and the p-hydroxycinnamate chromophore of PYP are indicated. Reprinted from reference with permission of the publisher. (Figure provided by M.-A. Gilles-Gonzalez.)
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Helical sliding mediates transmembrane signaling and compensatory adaptation. Cartoon representation of the receptor-kinase complex shows sites of adaptational methylation (small ovals) in methylated (shaded) and unmethylated (white) states. (Left) In the absence of ligand, complexed kinase is active (symbolized by broadcast lines). (Middle) Binding of ligand (e.g., sugar-occupied, sugar-binding protein) induces sliding of TM2 toward cytoplasm (arrow pointing down), resulting in kinase inhibition (no broadcast lines). (Right) Increased adaptational methylation slides TM2 back toward the periplasm (arrow pointing up), and kinase activity is restored. (Figure provided by Bryan Beel and Gerald Hazelbauer.)
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
Crystal structure of the dimerization, ATP-binding, and regulatory domains of the histidine kinase CheA. CheA is the central component of the signaling pathway that controls bacterial chemotaxis. This is the first crystal structure of a histidine kinase. It reveals the modular composition of CheA, where the three functions of dimerization, ATP binding, and regulation are segregated to three separate domains. The domains are linked by hinges (in red) that allow movement. As a result, the interfaces between domains are different in the two subunits. Unexpectedly, the ATP-binding domain is different from other known kinases but resembles the ATP-binding domain of three ATPases, the topoisomerase gyrase B, the DNA repair enzyme MutL, and the chaperone Hsp90. Subunit A is shown in blue tones, whereas subunit B is shown in gray tones. The dimerization (middle of the figure) is a four-helix bundle where two helices are provided by each monomer (dark blue and white). The two ATP-binding domains (black and blue) are independent and are separated by 90 Å. Each regulatory domain (light gray and light blue) forms two β-barrels of topology reminiscent of SH3 domains. Reprinted from reference with permission of the publisher. (Figure provided by A. Bilwes.)
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
Structural comparison of receptor modification enzymes methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB. Each protein contains two domains, an N-terminal domain (blue) and a C-terminal domain (magenta) connected by a linker (gold). The images are oriented to show the similar topologies of the C-terminal domains, the cofactor-binding domain of CheR, and the methylesterase catalytic domain of CheB. The S-adenosylmethionine cofactor in CheR and the active sites for phosphotransfer and methylesterase activities in CheB are depicted by ball-and-stick models (carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur are shown in gray, red, blue, and yellow, respectively). Images were prepared using MOLSCRIPT (16). (Figure provided by Ann Stock.)

References

    1. Ames S K, Frankema J, Kenney L J. C-terminal DNA binding stimulates N-terminal phosphorylation of the outer membrane protein regulator OmpR from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:11792–11797. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armitage J P, Schmitt R. Bacterial chemotaxis: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti—variations of a theme? Microbiology. 1997;143:3671–3682. - PubMed
    1. Bass R B, Coleman M D, Falke J J. Signaling domain of the aspartate receptor is a helical hairpin with a localized kinase docking surface: cysteine and disulfide scanning studies. Biochemistry. 1999;38:9317–9327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bass R B, Falke J J. The aspartate receptor cytoplasmic domain: in situ chemical analysis of structure, mechanism and dynamics. Structure. 1999;7:829–840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bass R B, Falke J J. Detection of a conserved alpha-helix in the kinase-docking region of the aspartate receptor by cysteine and disulfide scanning. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25006–25014. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources