Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Mar;29(1):66-75.
doi: 10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_7.

Disentangling the impact of low cognitive ability and inattention on social behavior and peer relationships. Conduct Problems Prevention Re search Group

C J Bellanti  1 , K L Bierman
Affiliations

Disentangling the impact of low cognitive ability and inattention on social behavior and peer relationships. Conduct Problems Prevention Re search Group

C J Bellanti et al. J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

Examined the shared and unique contributions of low cognitive ability and inattention to the development of social behavior problems and peer relationships of children at the time of school entry. Kindergarten and first-grade assessments of cognitive ability, inattention and prosocial and aggressive behavior were collected for a multisite, normative sample. Sociometric assessments of peer relationships were collected at the end of first grade. Cognitive ability and inattention both contributed to the prediction of social behavior and peer relationships. Low cognitive ability was particularly predictive of prosocial skill deficits, and social behavior mediated the relation between cognitive ability and social preference. Inattention predicted both prosocial skill deficits and elevated aggressive-disruptive behavior problems. Behavior problems partially mediated the relation between inattention and social preference. Identified subgroups of children with elevated levels of inattention or low cognitive ability showed different patterns of peer problems, with low acceptance characteristic of the low cognitive ability (only) group and high dislike ratings characteristic of the inattentive and inattentive/low-ability group. Implications are discussed for the design of early intervention and prevention programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Achenbach TM. Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4– 18, YSR, and CBCL–TRF profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
    1. Barkley RA. A critique of current diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit-hyperactive disorder: Clinical and research implications. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 1990;11:343–352. - PubMed
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;6:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Bierman KL. Improving the peer relationships of rejected children. In: Lahey B, Kazdin A, editors. Advances in clinical child psychology. New York: Plenum; 1989. pp. 53–84.
    1. Bierman KL, Greenberg MT, Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group . Social skill training in the Fast Track program. In: Peters R DeV, McMahon RJ., editors. Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse and delinquency. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1996. pp. 65–89.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources