Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 10693562
- DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00019
Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Thirty-eight oblong bilobed noncustom uncemented, porous-coated titanium acetabular components were used to reconstruct failed hip arthroplasties with large superior segmental acetabular bone deficiencies. No structural bone grafts were used. All patients were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean, 3 years) after the operation. One patient (whose socket rested primarily on a structural bone graft from a previous procedure) had revision surgery for acetabular loosening. No other patients have had revision surgery or had another ipsilateral hip operation. At latest followup, 35 patients had no or mild pain and two patients had moderate pain. Two implants migrated more than 2 mm in the first year, then stabilized. On the latest radiographs, two implants had bead shedding, but there was no measurable migration or change in position. For selected patients with large superolateral acetabular bone deficiencies, this implant facilitated a complex reconstruction, provided good clinical results, and showed satisfactory stability at early to midterm followup in most patients.
Similar articles
-
Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3806-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4556-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 26373851 Free PMC article.
-
Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Feb;82(2):197-206. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200002000-00005. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000. PMID: 10682728
-
The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.J Arthroplasty. 2004 Oct;19(7):867-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.024. J Arthroplasty. 2004. PMID: 15483803
-
Revision of failure acetabular components with cementless acetabular components.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002 Apr;31(4):206-7. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002. PMID: 12008850 Review.
-
Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part I: cementless shells.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Oct;38(10):509-14. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009. PMID: 20011740 Review.
Cited by
-
Custom triflange revision acetabular components for significant bone defects and pelvic discontinuity: Early UK experience.J Orthop. 2020 Feb 4;21:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.053. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct. J Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32071529 Free PMC article.
-
Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study.Int Orthop. 2005 Jun;29(3):135-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-005-0640-z. Epub 2005 Apr 5. Int Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15809874 Free PMC article.
-
[Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jul;22(3):256-67. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-8025-x. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 20676820 German.
-
Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss.Acta Orthop. 2012 Aug;83(4):347-52. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.718518. Epub 2012 Aug 20. Acta Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22900910 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):691-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0079-1. Epub 2008 Feb 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008. PMID: 18264858 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical