Joint effects of feeding and breeding behaviour on trophic dimorphism in hummingbirds
- PMID: 10693820
- PMCID: PMC1690480
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0951
Joint effects of feeding and breeding behaviour on trophic dimorphism in hummingbirds
Abstract
A survey of 166 hummingbird species reveals novel associations of bill-length sexual dimorphism (BLSD) with plumage and breeding behaviours. Across all species, female bills become proportionately longer than male bills (higher female-to-male BLSD ratio) as sexual dichromatism increases. However, male bills are proportionately longer (lower female-to-male BLSD ratio) in both lekkers (traditional group display) and clustered breeders (female harems or colonial nests) compared with dispersed breeders. The overall positive association of plumage with BLSD suggests that social status determines priority of access to nectar-providing flowers. Furthermore, the distinctive BLSD associated with breeding aggregations may arise from behaviours that impose constraints on the usual male priority at flowers: female dominance over males around nest colonies and male residence on lek-mating territories. These various factors appear to alter plumage and bill characters of both sexes to produce the range of dimorphisms within the various dispersed and aggregated breeding system categories. Feedback loops caused by ecological consequences of breeding behaviour may alter the evolutionary dynamics of breeding systems, bird-plant interactions, and competing pollinators, as well as help explain the lek paradox.
Similar articles
-
WHY SHOULD LEK-BREEDERS BE MONOMORPHIC?Evolution. 1990 Nov;44(7):1837-1852. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05254.x. Evolution. 1990. PMID: 28567800
-
Breeding biology and the evolution of dynamic sexual dichromatism in frogs.J Evol Biol. 2017 Dec;30(12):2104-2115. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13170. Epub 2017 Sep 19. J Evol Biol. 2017. PMID: 28833835
-
Effect of sexual dimorphism in bill length on foraging behavior: an experimental analysis of hummingbirds.Oecologia. 1993 May;94(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00317307. Oecologia. 1993. PMID: 28313864
-
Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):33-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00134.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011. PMID: 20377574 Review.
-
Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):485-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009. PMID: 19659887 Review.
Cited by
-
Shifting Paradigms in the Mechanics of Nectar Extraction and Hummingbird Bill Morphology.Integr Org Biol. 2019 Jan 2;1(1):oby006. doi: 10.1093/iob/oby006. eCollection 2019. Integr Org Biol. 2019. PMID: 33791513 Free PMC article.
-
The dual role of Andean topography in primary divergence: functional and neutral variation among populations of the hummingbird, Metallura tyrianthina.BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jan 22;16:22. doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0595-2. BMC Evol Biol. 2016. PMID: 26801894 Free PMC article.
-
Habitat type and ambient temperature contribute to bill morphology.Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;4(6):699-705. doi: 10.1002/ece3.911. Epub 2014 Feb 13. Ecol Evol. 2014. PMID: 24683453 Free PMC article.
-
Male-like female morphs in hummingbirds: the evolution of a widespread sex-limited plumage polymorphism.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 24;288(1945):20203004. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3004. Epub 2021 Feb 24. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33622128 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 12;365(1543):1053-63. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0284. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20194168 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources