Is the standard of care what we think it is?
- PMID: 10694082
- PMCID: PMC3015368
Is the standard of care what we think it is?
Abstract
For the most part, gynecologists are actually unaware of the issues involving surrogate versus quality of life outcomes, the "deceptive practice of medicine" and the true incidence of complications as they relate to the standard of care. An anonymous survey of 1958 practicing gynecologists attending seven national symposia revealed a significant number of unreported complications. Clearly, the standard of care (at least with regard to complication risk) is markedly different than has been suggested by the medical literature. Concomitantly, we suggest that physicians need to take a more active role in the policing of our own specialties.
References
-
- Phillips JM, Hulka JM, Keith GL. Laparoscopic procedures: AAGL membership survey for 1975. J Reprod Med. 1977;18:227–238 - PubMed
-
- Soderstrom RM, Levy BS. Bowel injuries during laparoscopy: causes and medicolegal questions. Cont Obs Gyn. 1986;27:41–45
-
- Baadsgaard FE, et al. Major vascular injury during gyneco-logic laparoscopy: report and review. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 1989;68:283–285 - PubMed
-
- Borton M. Laparoscopic Complications. Prevention and Management. Toronto: B.C. Decker; 1986
-
- Carmichael Laparoscopy: cardiac considerations. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:59–70 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources