Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Oct-Dec;3(4):331-4.

Is the standard of care what we think it is?

Affiliations
Review

Is the standard of care what we think it is?

J R Feste et al. JSLS. 1999 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

For the most part, gynecologists are actually unaware of the issues involving surrogate versus quality of life outcomes, the "deceptive practice of medicine" and the true incidence of complications as they relate to the standard of care. An anonymous survey of 1958 practicing gynecologists attending seven national symposia revealed a significant number of unreported complications. Clearly, the standard of care (at least with regard to complication risk) is markedly different than has been suggested by the medical literature. Concomitantly, we suggest that physicians need to take a more active role in the policing of our own specialties.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Phillips JM, Hulka JM, Keith GL. Laparoscopic procedures: AAGL membership survey for 1975. J Reprod Med. 1977;18:227–238 - PubMed
    1. Soderstrom RM, Levy BS. Bowel injuries during laparoscopy: causes and medicolegal questions. Cont Obs Gyn. 1986;27:41–45
    1. Baadsgaard FE, et al. Major vascular injury during gyneco-logic laparoscopy: report and review. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 1989;68:283–285 - PubMed
    1. Borton M. Laparoscopic Complications. Prevention and Management. Toronto: B.C. Decker; 1986
    1. Carmichael Laparoscopy: cardiac considerations. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:59–70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources