Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Feb;21(2):269-75.

Cervical diskography: analysis of provoked responses at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5

Affiliations

Cervical diskography: analysis of provoked responses at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5

K P Schellhas et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Previous authors have described the locations of provoked responses to cervical diskography from C3-C4 to C6-C7, but we have found no description of the findings at C2-C3. This study was undertaken to analyze the sensations provoked during cervical diskography at C2-C3 and to compare the results with those provoked at C3-C4 and C4-C5.

Methods: The locations of diskographically provoked responses from 40 consecutive patients who had undergone C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 diskography were analyzed. Only intensely painful (> or = 7/10) and concordant responses were considered. Disk morphology on MR images and diskograms was also compared with the provoked responses.

Results: Eighteen subjects described either unilateral (n = 10) or bilateral (usually asymmetric) (n = 8) concordant pain at the craniovertebral junction in response to C2-C3 diskography. Nine subjects described either unilateral (n = 5) or bilateral (n = 4) neck pain during injection. Cephalalgia or head pain was provoked in 19 subjects, seven bilaterally. Four subjects described either unilateral (n = 3) or bilateral (n = 1) trapezius muscle and/or shoulder pain. Preliminary MR studies were not helpful, as most C2-C3 disks either appeared normal or exhibited nonspecific signs of degeneration. All disks exhibited either fissuring or extradiskal leakage of contrast material at diskography, regardless of the response provoked.

Conclusion: Diskography at C2-C3 and C3-C4 frequently produces pain sensations in the head, craniovertebral junction, and neck. There is no correlation between C2-C3 disk morphology and the diskographically provoked response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>fig</sc> 1.
fig 1.
Patient with 5/10 concordant, bilateral, occipital head, CVJ, and upper neck pain. A, Sagittal MPGR image (3-mm thick, 1-mm gap, 20° flip angle, TE = 10) shows a completely normal-appearing C2–C3 disk. B, C2–C3 diskogram in anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views shows uncovertebral fissure (arrow on left) along with full-thickness posterior tear and contrast leakage (arrow on right).
<sc>fig</sc> 2.
fig 2.
Patient with 6.5/10 concordant, but mostly right-sided, occipital and mastoid pain with uncovertebral fissure. A and B, Sagittal (A) and axial (B) MPGR images (3-mm thick, TE = 1015) show slight forward displacement of C2 on C3 (A). Axial image (B) appears normal. Because of the slight forward displacement of C2 on C3 (A), C2–C3 disk is judged to be abnormal. C and D, Anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) diskograms reveal an uncovertebral fissure and contrast leakage (arrows).
<sc>fig</sc> 3.
fig 3.
Patient with 9/10 concordant unilateral mastoid and occipital head pain associated with uncovertebral tear. A, Sagittal, 3-mm-thick MPGR midline image reveals relative dehydration of the C2–C3 disk (small arrow) as compared with the normally hydrated C6–C7 disk (large arrow). B and C, Anteroposterior (B) and lateral (C) diskograms show an uncovertebral fissure (arrow in B). Note how the 25-gauge needle (arrow in C) enters the disk slightly from below.
<sc>fig</sc> 4.
fig 4.
Patient with 9/10 concordant bilateral neck, CVJ, and occipital head pain with slightly abnormal C2–C3 disk contour at MR imaging. A, Sagittal midline, 3-mm-thick MPGR image shows slight dorsal bulging of the C2–C3 disk annulus (arrow). Note previous interbody fusion at C4–C5. B and C, Anteroposterior (B) and lateral (C) diskograms reveal bilateral uncovertebral fissures (arrows in B). The fissures are superimposed on lateral view (arrow in C).
<sc>fig</sc> 5.
fig 5.
Patient with 8.5/10 concordant, diffuse, bilateral CVJ, occipital, parietal, and temporal head pain associated with bilateral and posterior annular tears of the C2–C3 disk. A and B, A large, broadly based defect is seen on both projections (arrow in B), extending into C2–C3 foramina (A).
<sc>fig</sc> 6.
fig 6.
Analysis of diskographically provoked responses at C2–C3, C3–C4, and C4–C5. Forty disks were studied at each level. Only intensely painful (≥ 7/10) and concordant disks were counted
<sc>fig</sc> 7.
fig 7.
Specific locations of head pain perceptions from intensely painful, concordant disks

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N. Clinical review: whiplash injury. Pain 1994;58:283-307 - PubMed
    1. Bogduk N. Innervation and pain patterns in the cervical spine. Clin Phys Ther 1988;17:1-13
    1. Bogduk N. The anatomy and pathophysiology of whiplash. Clin Biomech 1986;1:92-101 - PubMed
    1. Bogduk N, Windsor M, Inglis A. The innervation of the cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 1988;13:2-8 - PubMed
    1. Cloward RB. Cervical diskography: a contribution to the etiology and mechanism of neck, shoulder and arm pain. Ann Surg 1959;150:1052-1064 - PMC - PubMed