Informal coercion in the physical care of patients suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation
- PMID: 10696181
- DOI: 10.1177/096973309900600408
Informal coercion in the physical care of patients suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation
Abstract
This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of moderate degree) and meddlesome coercion. The use of modest coercion is defended. It is argued that medical personnel ought to decide exclusively about the use of modest coercion. However, no law should render legitimate the use of even modest coercion. It is conceded that to prohibit the use of a kind of coercion that is expected to take place is hypocrisy. It is argued that this is, however, an acceptable form of hypocrisy.
Similar articles
-
[Treatment of a patient against his will: ethical and legal approaches].Rev Med Brux. 2000 Sep;21(4):A334-8. Rev Med Brux. 2000. PMID: 11068490 Review. French.
-
Frontiers in care: a case of compulsory treatment in AIDS dementia. Case study and commentaries.J Med Ethics. 2000 Feb;26(1):61-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.1.61. J Med Ethics. 2000. PMID: 10701174 Free PMC article.
-
Counterpoint: is patient control of treatment always appropriate?Arthritis Care Res. 1990 Sep;3(3):167-70. Arthritis Care Res. 1990. PMID: 2285757
-
A rebuttal to Nancy Hewak's "The Ethical, Medical and Legal Implications of the Forcible Treatment Provisions of the Criminal Code".Health Law Can. 1996 Feb;16(3):65. Health Law Can. 1996. PMID: 10178136 No abstract available.
-
Can paternalism be justified in mental health care?J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):260-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00786.x. J Adv Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9725721 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical