Complexities in the analysis of cryptic taxa within the genus Anopheles

Abstract

Grassi's discovery one hundred years ago brought to light the puzzle of anophelism without malaria in Europe. With the discovery of the European Anopheles maculipennis complex the puzzle was solved but the 'species problem' has not gone away. Meaningful epidemiologic studies and effective vector control programs depend upon efficient methods for discriminating among the major vectors, lesser vectors and non-vectors of ubiquitous anopheline sibling species complexes. We now have a variety of techniques for identifying cryptic species, ranging from crossing studies through morphological, cytogenetic, allozyme and repetitive DNA-based strategies. However, cytogenetic and molecular data can also be used to infer evolutionary relationships among cryptic taxa. This approach has been crucial to understanding the biology of the vector, and may illuminate the speciation process and the human impact upon this process. Nevertheless, the analysis of cryptic taxa has proven unexpectedly complex. Studies of An. funestus and An. gambiae reveal conflicts among classes of markers and between different genomic locations. The data are consistent with a model of speciation in which gene flow may still occur in parts of the genome, and they suggest that caution should be exercised in the interpretation of results from small numbers of loci, only one type of marker, and markers located in specific genomic regions such as chromosomal inversions.