Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Mar;38(3):1161-5.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1161-1165.2000.

Comparison of a new neuraminidase detection assay with an enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in nasal wash specimens

D E Noyola  1 , B Clark, F T O'Donnell, R L Atmar, J Greer, G J Demmler
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of a new neuraminidase detection assay with an enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in nasal wash specimens

D E Noyola et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

The performance of a new, rapid, easy-to-perform assay based on neuraminidase enzyme activity for detection of influenza virus types A and B was compared to detection by culture, indirect immunofluorescence, and enzyme immunoassay in 479 nasal wash specimens from children with respiratory infections. Compared to isolation of influenza virus by culture, the neuraminidase assay had a sensitivity of 70.1%, specificity of 92.4%, positive predictive value of 76.3%, and negative predictive value of 89.9%. There was a higher sensitivity for the detection of influenza A virus (76.4%) than for influenza B virus (40.9%). Indirect immunofluorescence showed a sensitivity of 59.8% and specificity of 97% compared to culture isolation for detection of influenza A and B viruses. Enzyme immunoassay showed a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 98.1% for the detection of influenza A alone. The quality of the nasal wash specimen had a significant effect on the detection of influenza virus by all of the assays. A strong response of the neuraminidase assay was more likely to represent a culture-confirmed influenza infection. This new rapid neuraminidase assay was useful for the detection of influenza A and B viruses in nasal wash specimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Results of respiratory viral cultures performed at the Diagnostic Virology Laboratory during the study period (1 January 1999 to 20 March 1999). The numbers are the numbers of specimens in the different categories.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Atmar R L, Baxter B D, Dominguez E A, Taber L H. Comparison of reverse transcription-PCR with tissue culture and other rapid diagnostic assays for detection of type A influenza virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2604–2606. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atmar R L, Baxter B D. Typing and subtyping clinical isolates of influenza virus using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Clin Diagn Virol. 1996;7:77–84. - PubMed
    1. Beighton D, Whiley R A. Sialidase activity of the “Streptococcus milleri group” and other viridans group streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1431–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boom R, Sol C J A, Salimans M M M, Jansen C L, Wertheim-van Dillen P M E, van der Noordaa J. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:495–503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Correa A G, Allen C, Taber L H, Couch R B. Program and abstracts of the 32nd Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.: Infectious Diseases Society of America; 1994. Comparison of clinical specimens in the rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants, abstr. 327; p. 56A.

Publication types

MeSH terms