Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999:97:349-67; discussion 367-72.

A value analysis model applied to the management of amblyopia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A value analysis model applied to the management of amblyopia

G R Beauchamp et al. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the value of amblyopia-related services by utilizing a health value model (HVM). Cost and quality criteria are evaluated in accordance with the interests of patients, physicians, and purchasers.

Methods: We applied an HVM to a hypothetical statistical ("median") child with amblyopia whose visual acuity is 20/80 and to a group of children with amblyopia who are managed by our practice. We applied the model to calculate the value of these services by evaluating the responses of patients and physicians and relating these responses to clinical outcomes.

Results: The consensus value of care for the hypothetical median child was calculated to be 0.406 (of 1.000). For those children managed in our practice, the calculated value is 0.682. Clinically, 79% achieved 20/40 or better visual acuity, and the mean final visual acuity was 0.2 logMAR (20/32). Value appraisals revealed significant concerns about the financial aspects of amblyopia-related services, particularly among physicians. Patients rated services more positively than did physicians.

Conclusions: Amblyopia care is difficult, sustained, and important work that requires substantial sensitivity to and support of children and families. Compliance and early detection are essential to success. The value of amblyopia services is rated significantly higher by patients than by physicians. Relative to the measured value, amblyopia care is undercompensated. The HVM is useful to appraise clinical service delivery and its variation. The costs of failure and the benefits of success are high; high-value amblyopia care yields substantial dividends and should be commensurately compensated in the marketplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Public Health Rev. 1986;14(3-4):213-35 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1999 Mar 24-31;281(12):1087-92 - PubMed
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226(4):309-12 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Apr;31(4):758-65 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Feb;75(2):111-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources