Positive and negative compatibility effects
- PMID: 10703259
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03212064
Positive and negative compatibility effects
Abstract
This paper reports a series of four experiments that established a negative compatibility effect (NCE) by which compatible distractors led to slower and less accurate target performance than did incompatible ones (Experiment 1). This effect is interpreted as an early perceptual effect that delays the attribution of visual attention over the target location in the compatible condition. This view predicted that the NCE should be observed only when attention has to be selectively attributed to the target location. In Experiments 2 and 3, this prediction was tested by manipulating the perceptual load in the display. High perceptual load displays are known to require selective attention (Lavie, 1995). Accordingly, reliable NCEs were observed when high-load displays were used. In contrast, reduced NCEs were found in displays that did not require selective attention. Experiment 4 established that the manifestation of the NCE was influenced by low-level visual cues, such as brightness and contrast. Overall, these experiments indicated that the NCE can be understood as an early perceptual effect, which arises from a conflict between the cues that guide the distribution of attention when the task requires selective attention.
Similar articles
-
The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.Percept Psychophys. 2003 Jul;65(5):817-28. doi: 10.3758/bf03194817. Percept Psychophys. 2003. PMID: 12956588
-
Attention and spatial selection: electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load.Percept Psychophys. 2000 Jan;62(1):175-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03212070. Percept Psychophys. 2000. PMID: 10703265
-
Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.018. Epub 2010 Apr 27. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20430048
-
Negative cues lead to more inefficient search than positive cues even at later stages of visual search.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Oct;190:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 20. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018. PMID: 30036747
-
Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Apr;42(4):530-9. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000166. Epub 2015 Nov 16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016. PMID: 26569336
Cited by
-
Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions.Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 17;5:705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00705. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25101012 Free PMC article.
-
Reading as functional coordination: not recycling but a novel synthesis.Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 26;5:1046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01046. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25309489 Free PMC article.
-
Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):631-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0244-8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012. PMID: 22467354
-
Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1801-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.019. Epub 2007 Jan 10. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 17291549 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual load in sport and the heuristic value of the perceptual load paradigm in examining expertise-related perceptual-cognitive adaptations.Cogn Process. 2013 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0529-x. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Cogn Process. 2013. PMID: 23053842