Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria
- PMID: 10706744
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<334::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-z
Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria
Abstract
Background: This study was conducted to compare noise exposure measurements based on the recently revised noise exposure criteria recommended by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the current U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hearing Conservation Amendment to the occupational noise standard.
Methods: Daily 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) personal noise exposures were obtained for 61 workers using dosimeters set simultaneously to the NIOSH and OSHA Hearing Conservation Amendment (OSHA-HCA) criteria. A variety of work groups with the potential for noise exposure were evaluated as a part of this investigation.
Results: Noise dose based on the NIOSH criteria was higher than the corresponding OSHA-HCA noise dose with differences in noise exposures measured under the two criteria equal to 6.6 dBA. Should the new NIOSH recommendation on noise measurement be adopted as standard, the number of workers to be enrolled in a hearing loss prevention program was estimated to increase by 2. 7-fold from 23% to 75% of the study population.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that if the NIOSH criteria are to be adopted as an OSHA standard, there is likely to be a substantial increase in the number of workers in hearing conservation programs.
Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Noise exposure levels for musicians during rehearsal and performance times.Med Probl Perform Art. 2012 Mar;27(1):31-6. Med Probl Perform Art. 2012. PMID: 22543320
-
Occupational noise exposures among three farm families in northwest Ohio.J Agromedicine. 2008;13(3):165-74. doi: 10.1080/10599240802406049. J Agromedicine. 2008. PMID: 19064421
-
Occupational Noise Exposure of Employees at Locally-Owned Restaurants in a College Town.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(7):489-99. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1018517. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015. PMID: 25738733 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational hearing loss.Am J Ind Med. 2000 Jan;37(1):112-20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200001)37:1<112::aid-ajim9>3.0.co;2-#. Am J Ind Med. 2000. PMID: 10573600 Review.
-
Occupational hearing conservation.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;24(2):403-14. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991. PMID: 1857619 Review.
Cited by
-
Pan-caspase inhibitor protects against noise-induced hearing loss in a rodent model.Front Neurosci. 2025 Feb 10;19:1497773. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1497773. eCollection 2025. Front Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 39995440 Free PMC article.
-
Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;17(23):8963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238963. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33276507 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures.Environ Health Prev Med. 2020 Oct 31;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 33129267 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An exploratory study of noise exposures in educational and private dental clinics.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Oct 2;13(10):741-9. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1177646. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016. PMID: 27077918 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Occupational Noise Exposure among Groundskeepers in North Carolina Public Universities.Environ Health Insights. 2016 Jun 13;10:83-92. doi: 10.4137/EHI.S39682. eCollection 2016. Environ Health Insights. 2016. PMID: 27330303 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical