Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 Feb;28(2):408-13.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00020.

The distribution of costs of care in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The distribution of costs of care in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

E W Ely et al. Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To delineate the costs of care of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and respiratory failure and to compare them with those of other mechanically ventilated patients.

Design: A post hoc analysis of a prospective investigation.

Setting: Medical and coronary intensive care units (ICUs) of an 804-bed, university-based hospital.

Patients: A total of 300 mechanically ventilated patients, 44 with COPD and 256 others, were included.

Measurements and main results: Despite similar lengths of ICU stay (9 days) and mechanical ventilation (5.5 days COPD vs. 5 days other, p = .11), ICU respiratory care costs for patients with COPD were $2,422 ($1,157-$6,110) [median U.S. dollars (interquartile range)] vs. $1,580 ($738-$3,322) for the others (p = .01). Ventilator costs for COPD patients were $1,795 ($943-$5,782) vs. $1,574 ($613-$3,112) (p = .12). Total hospitalization respiratory care costs for COPD patients were higher, $4,064 ($2,422-$9,572) vs. $2,342 ($1,186-$4,591), (p = .0001), and 74.4% of the median difference in cost between COPD patients and others was accounted for by spontaneous nebulizers (p = .001), metered dose inhalers (p = .01), and pulse oximetry (p = .02). By using multiple linear regression analyses, we found that COPD remained associated with higher respiratory costs (p<.05). Respiratory Care was the third largest category of hospital costs after beds (27%) and pharmacy expenses (25%), and it comprised approximately 14% of total cost. Total hospital costs were large for both groups, but did not differ between COPD and the others [$24,217 ($16,211-$58,834) vs. $27,672 ($15,692-$53,766), respectively (p = .96)]. Linear regression analyses showed that only Acute Lung Injury score was significantly related to total ICU and hospital costs of care (p<.05).

Conclusions: Costs of ICU and non-ICU respiratory care for patients with COPD are higher than costs of care for other mechanically ventilated patients. Although the increased cost of bronchodilators and oximetry in these patients may serve as target areas for reductions in respiratory care costs, it may also be true that these modalities of therapy and management are necessary and need to be used with even greater intensity to achieve better outcomes. The predominant contributions of bed and pharmacy costs in all of our patients with respiratory failure support research efforts addressing these aspects of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources