Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Feb;14(2):76-85.
doi: 10.1097/00005131-200002000-00002.

Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects

D Paley et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the results and complications of Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of tibial bone defects.

Design: Retrospectively reviewed consecutive series.

Methods: Nineteen patients with tibial bone defects were treated by the Ilizarov bone transport method. The mean bone defect was ten centimeters, and there were eight soft-tissue defects. The mean external fixation time was sixteen months. Ten patients required debridement of the bone ends and/or bone grafting of the docking site at the end of transport.

Results: Union was achieved in all cases. One refracture of the docking site required retreatment with the Ilizarov apparatus to achieve union. There was one residual leg length discrepancy greater than 2.5 centimeters and two angular deformities greater than 5 degrees. There were no recurrent or residual infections. Seven of the eight soft-tissue defects were closed by soft-tissue transport; the eighth required a free-vascularized flap. The bone results were graded as fifteen excellent, three good, and one fair. The functional results were graded as twelve excellent, six good, and one poor. There were twenty-two minor complications, sixteen major complications without residual sequelae, and three major complications with residual sequelae. To treat the bone defect and the complications, a mean of 2.9 operations per patient was required.

Conclusions: Our results compare favorably with those for other methods of bone grafting as well as with those from other published accounts of the Ilizarov method, especially considering the large defect size in this series. The main disadvantage of the Ilizarov method is the lengthy external fixation time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources