Analgesia for labor pain: a cost model
- PMID: 10719963
- DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00028
Analgesia for labor pain: a cost model
Abstract
Background: Epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia with opioids are two techniques for the relief of labor pain. The goal of this study was to develop a cost-identification model to quantify the costs (from society's perspective) of epidural analgesia compared with intravenous analgesia for labor pain. Because there is no valid method to assign a dollar value to differing levels of analgesia, the cost of each technique can be compared with the analgesic benefit (patient pain scores) of each technique.
Methods: The authors created a cost model for epidural and intravenous analgesia by reviewing the literature to determine the rates of associated clinical outcomes (benefit of each technique to produce analgesia) and complications (e.g., postdural puncture headache). The authors then analyzed data from their institution's cost-accounting system to determine the hospital cost for parturients admitted for delivery, estimated the cost of each complication, and performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the cost impact of changing key variables. A secondary analysis was performed assuming that the cost of nursing was fixed (did not change depending on the number of nursing interventions).
Results: If the cesarean section rate equals 20% for both intravenous and epidural analgesia, the additional expected cost per patient to society of epidural analgesia of labor pain ranges from $259 (assuming nursing costs in the labor and delivery suite do not vary with the number of nursing interventions) to $338 (assuming nursing costs do increase as the number of interventions increases) relative to the expected cost of intravenous analgesia for labor pain. This cost difference results from increased professional costs and complication costs associated with epidural analgesia.
Conclusions: Epidural analgesia is more costly than intravenous analgesia. How the cost of the anesthesiologist and nursing care is calculated affects how much more costly epidural analgesia is relative to intravenous analgesia. Published studies have determined that epidural analgesia provides relief of labor pain superior to intravenous analgesia, quantified in one study as 40 mm better on a 100-mm scale during the first stage of labor and 29 mm better during the second stage of labor. Patients, physicians, and society need to weigh the value of improved pain relief from epidural analgesia versus the increased cost of epidural analgesia.
Comment in
-
How do we measure (the cost of) pain relief?Anesthesiology. 2000 Mar;92(3):643-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200003000-00006. Anesthesiology. 2000. PMID: 10719941 No abstract available.
-
To increase obstetric reimbursement rates, we need to improve the product.Anesthesiology. 2001 Jan;94(1):178-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200101000-00037. Anesthesiology. 2001. PMID: 11135744 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(5):305-18. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220050-00002. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 11994040 Review.
-
An economic analysis of patient controlled remifentanil and epidural analgesia as pain relief in labour (RAVEL trial); a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205220. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30307986 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women.Anesthesiology. 2004 Jan;100(1):142-8; discussion 6A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200401000-00023. Anesthesiology. 2004. PMID: 14695735
-
Does epidural increase the incidence of cesarean delivery or instrumental labor in Saudi populations?Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;19(3):693-704. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007. PMID: 18044297 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidural analgesia in labor: an evaluation of risks and benefits.Birth. 1996 Jun;23(2):63-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1996.tb00833.x. Birth. 1996. PMID: 8826170 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcranial Doppler role in prediction of post-dural puncture headache in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section: prospective observational study.J Anesth. 2019 Jun;33(3):426-434. doi: 10.1007/s00540-019-02652-2. Epub 2019 May 9. J Anesth. 2019. PMID: 31073654
-
Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(5):305-18. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220050-00002. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 11994040 Review.
-
Regional versus systemic analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0851-2. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 31623571 Free PMC article.
-
An economic analysis of patient controlled remifentanil and epidural analgesia as pain relief in labour (RAVEL trial); a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205220. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30307986 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity aerobic water exercise during pregnancy for reducing use of epidural analgesia during labor: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1715-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29642862 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources