Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jun;2(2):77-83.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022936705438.

Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women

Affiliations

Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women

N R Boyd et al. Matern Child Health J. 1998 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this paper were to determine the rate of misclassification of smoking and nonsmoking status by self-reports and saliva continine of pregnant women participating in a smoking cessation trial, determine the relationship of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and saliva continine, and examine whether misclassification was due to an inappropriate saliva continine cutoff point.

Methods: End of pregnancy self-reports of smoking status and saliva continine were used to calculate misclassification rates.

Results: The findings revealed that 61 of 441 self-reported smokers had biochemical values inconsistent with smoking status for a smoking misclassification rate of 13.8%. The results also revealed that 28 of 107 self-reported quitters had continine values consistent with smoking status for a nonsmoking misclassification rate of 26.2%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were then plotted to determine whether misclassification resulted from an inappropriate cutoff point. The continine cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity for all women was 24 ng/ml. Racial ROC comparisons indicated a higher cutoff point for blacks than whites. Use of any of the ROC indicated cutoff points would not change the misclassification rates.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that underreporting of smoking status during pregnancy is high and that social desirability of nonsmoking status may have contributed to the lack of precision in saliva continine to distinguish smoking status in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1987 Jul;77(7):846-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1439-43 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Sep;98(9):859-65 - PubMed
    1. Health Educ Res. 1998 Sep;13(3):419-38 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957 Apr;73(4):807-15 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources