Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis
- PMID: 10733085
- DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/12.1.65
Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis
Abstract
Objective: To study the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis, and their value to the clinician.
Main outcome measures: The negative appendectomy rate and the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis.
Result: The diagnostic accuracy was 88% (men 95%, women 80%). Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were examined by ultrasonography preoperatively. The sensitivity for ultrasonography was 0.82 and the specificity was 0.97. Forty-nine patients were examined by computed tomography preoperatively. The sensitivity for computer tomography was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.95.
Conclusions: We conclude that ultrasound and computed tomography investigations on patients with suspected appendicitis are of great value. Computed tomography seems to have a higher sensitivity than ultrasound and a high specificity. In fertile women, where unnecessary surgery is best avoided, we believe that computed tomography investigation or ultrasound examination are better alternatives to surgical intervention.
Similar articles
-
Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis.Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):101-6. Am Surg. 2013. PMID: 23317620
-
The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation.Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):29-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.29. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 14702443
-
Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):131-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011780. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 12354996
-
Ultrasonography and computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2003 Apr;24(2):69-73. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2171(03)90002-3. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2003. PMID: 12744498 Review.
-
Update on imaging for acute appendicitis.Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Feb;91(1):141-54. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.10.017. Surg Clin North Am. 2011. PMID: 21184905 Review.
Cited by
-
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0304-6. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16736333 Clinical Trial.
-
An approach to model Right Iliac Fossa pain using pain-only-parameters for screening acute appendicitis.J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1491-502. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9610-0. Epub 2010 Oct 15. J Med Syst. 2012. PMID: 20949312
-
Retrospective Cohort Study to Determine the Effect of Socioeconomic Status and Distance to Hospital on Negative Appendicectomy Rates in a Rural Setting.Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70026. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70026. Aust J Rural Health. 2025. PMID: 40066902 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonography in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis.Med J Armed Forces India. 2005 Jul;61(3):249-52. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(05)80166-2. Epub 2011 May 30. Med J Armed Forces India. 2005. PMID: 27407771 Free PMC article.
-
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31743429 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical