Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs
- PMID: 10738802
- DOI: 10.1121/1.428434
Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs
Abstract
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are used widely in humans to assess cochlear function. It is well known that 2f1-f2 DPOAE amplitude increases as the f2/f1 ratio increases from 1.0 to about 1.20, and then decreases as the f2/f1 ratio increases above 1.20, showing an amplitude ratio function, which is thought to be related to cochlear filtering properties. Different lower sideband DPOAEs are believed to show the same amplitude ratio functions as the 2f1-f2 DPOAE, with a magnitude peak situated at a constant DPOAE frequency relative to f2. More recently, several studies have suggested the involvement of a DPOAE component coming from its own distortion product place as well as the DPOAE component coming from the f2 place. To investigate DPOAE generation sites and the importance of the DPOAE frequency place, amplitude ratio functions of 2f1-f2, 3f1-2f2, 4f1-3f2 and 2f2-f1, 3f2-2f1, 4f2-3f1 DPOAE components have been systematically studied in 18 normally hearing subjects, using an f2 fixed, f1 sweep method, and an f1 fixed, f2 sweep method, at ten different f2 frequencies. Results show a dependency of the distortion magnitude peak on f2 frequency for each lower sideband DPOAE, and a small frequency shift of the distortion peak for the high order lower sideband DPOAE components. Strong correlation between the different lower sideband DPOAE amplitude were obtained, whether they were recorded with the same f1 (and a different f2) or with the same f2 (and a different f1), suggesting that lower side-band DPOAE amplitude does not depend on small variations in the f2 frequency. Moreover, correlations between DPOAE amplitude and tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) are highly significant for TBOAEs centered at the f2 frequency and at 1/2 octave below the f2 frequency, suggesting some degree of importance of the cochlear status at frequencies below f2 in DPOAE amplitude. Subjects presenting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions showed a greater lower sideband DPOAE amplitude recorded for low f2/f1 ratios, and a distortion magnitude peak shifted towards higher frequencies. The best correlation between upper sideband DPOAE amplitude and lower sideband DPOAE amplitude occurred for lower sideband DPOAEs generated by an f2 frequency 1/2 octave to 1 octave below the primaries used to generate upper sideband DPOAEs, suggesting a site of generation basal to f2 for the upper sideband DPOAEs. Correlations between TBOAE amplitude and upper sideband DPOAE amplitude agreed with a site of upper sideband DPOAE generation basal to f2, and which would move with the DPOAE frequency itself.
Similar articles
-
Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. II. Implications for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1640-62. doi: 10.1121/1.416064. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996. PMID: 8817892
-
Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Apr;103(4):1957-71. doi: 10.1121/1.421347. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998. PMID: 9566319
-
Indications of different distortion product otoacoustic emission mechanisms from a detailed f1,f2 area study.J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan;107(1):457-73. doi: 10.1121/1.428351. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000. PMID: 10641654
-
Sources and mechanisms of DPOAE generation: implications for the prediction of auditory sensitivity.Ear Hear. 2003 Oct;24(5):367-79. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000090439.16438.9F. Ear Hear. 2003. PMID: 14534408 Review.
-
[High-resolution distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: method and clinical applications].HNO. 2014 Oct;62(10):718-24. doi: 10.1007/s00106-014-2921-6. HNO. 2014. PMID: 25270969 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Nov;124(5):3009-21. doi: 10.1121/1.2990716. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008. PMID: 19045788 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of endolymphatic hydrops on DPOAE in subjects with normal to mild hearing loss.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Dec 25;8(1):262-268. doi: 10.1002/lio2.998. eCollection 2023 Feb. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022. PMID: 36846415 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous