Similar articles

• Environmental genotoxicity evaluation using cytogenetic end points in wild rodents.

  de Souza Bueno AM, de Bragança Pereira CA, Rabello-Gay MN. de Souza Bueno AM, et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Dec;108(12):1165-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-1240198. Environ Health Perspect. 2000. PMID: 11133397 Free PMC article.
• [Character of reproductive losses in bank vole populations living in a habitat polluted with toxic substances].

  Bezel' VS, Mukhacheva SV. Bezel' VS, et al. Dokl Akad Nauk. 1995 Nov;345(1):135-7. Dokl Akad Nauk. 1995. PMID: 8580861 Russian. No abstract available.
• Study on the cytogenetic changes induced by benzene and hydroquinone in human lymphocytes.

  Peng D, Jiaxing W, Chunhui H, Weiyi P, Xiaomin W. Peng D, et al. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012 Apr;31(4):322-35. doi: 10.1177/0960327111433900. Epub 2012 Feb 1. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012. PMID: 22297702
• Molecular epidemiology studies of carcinogenic environmental pollutants. Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in environmental pollution on exogenous and oxidative DNA damage.

  Farmer PB, Singh R, Kaur B, Sram RJ, Binkova B, Kalina I, Popov TA, Garte S, Taioli E, Gabelova A, Cebulska-Wasilewska A. Farmer PB, et al. Mutat Res. 2003 Nov;544(2-3):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.09.002. Mutat Res. 2003. PMID: 14644342 Review.
• [Do liver cells predict the risk of damage by chemical substances?].

  Kamiński M, Wiaderkiewicz R. Kamiński M, et al. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2004;55(3):195-206. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2004. PMID: 15732496 Review. Polish.