Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Mar;23(3):175-80.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230309.

Severity of residual stenosis of infarct-related lesion and left ventricular function after single-vessel anterior wall myocardial infarction: implication of ST-segment elevation in lead aVL of the admission electrocardiograms

Affiliations

Severity of residual stenosis of infarct-related lesion and left ventricular function after single-vessel anterior wall myocardial infarction: implication of ST-segment elevation in lead aVL of the admission electrocardiograms

H Yoshino et al. Clin Cardiol. 2000 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between the severity of chronic-phase stenosis of infarct-related lesions (IRLs) and chronic left ventricular function in anterior acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) has not been adequately investigated.

Hypothesis: This study investigated whether ST elevation in lead aVL of admission electrocardiogram (ECG) would be a determinant factor of the relationship between the severity of stenosis of the IRL and chronic left ventricular function after anterior wall AMI.

Methods: One month after AMI, the IRL was evaluated by coronary angiography in 98 patients with anterior AMI, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined using multigated radionuclide angiocardiography. Patients were classified according to the severity of the IRL: patients with 100% occlusion (Group O), patients with 90 to 99% stenosis (Group H), and patients with < or =75% stenosis (Group L). Patients with ST elevation > or =0.1 mV in the aVL lead on their admission ECG were included in the ST-elevation group, and those with ST elevation <0.1 mV were included in the non-ST-elevation group.

Results: The LVEF was greater in the non-ST-elevation group than in the ST-elevation group (p<0.0001), and the LVEF in a whole group as follows: Group L LVEF>Group H LVEF>Group O LVEF (p = 0.0160). In the ST-elevation group, LVEF was higher in Group L than in the other groups (p = 0.0251). There were three independent predictors of a reduced LVEF: ST-elevation in aVL [odds ratio (OR): 3.38, p = 0.0044], IRL stenosis > or =90% (OR: 2.90, p = 0.0044), and the IRL occurring in the left anterior descending artery proximal to the first diagonal branch (OR: 6.31, p = 0.0024).

Conclusion: Left ventricular function was preserved, regardless of the severity of residual stenosis, in patients without ST elevation in aVL if the IRL was not totally occluded. In patients with ST elevation in aVL, LVEF was lower in patients with more severe stenosis, even if the IRL was patent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ISIS‐2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group : Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS‐2. Lancet 1988; ii: 349–360 - PubMed
    1. GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell Infarto Miocardico) : Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; i: 397–402 - PubMed
    1. GUSTO Investigators : An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 679–682 - PubMed
    1. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group : Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: Collaborative trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311–322 - PubMed
    1. Hochman JS, Choo H: Limitation of myocardial infarct expansion by reperfusion independent of myocardial salvage. Circulation 1987; 75: 299–306 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances