Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1043-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1043.

Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care

P Kinnersley  1 , E Anderson, K Parry, J Clement, L Archard, P Turton, A Stainthorpe, A Fraser, C C Butler, C Rogers
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care

P Kinnersley et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain any differences between care from nurse practitioners and that from general practitioners for patients seeking "same day" consultations in primary care.

Design: Randomised controlled trial with patients allocated by one of two randomisation schemes (by day or within day).

Setting: 10 general practices in south Wales and south west England.

Subjects: 1368 patients requesting same day consultations.

Main outcome measures: Patient satisfaction, resolution of symptoms and concerns, care provided (prescriptions, investigations, referrals, recall, and length of consultation), information provided to patients, and patients' intentions for seeking care in the future.

Results: Generally patients consulting nurse practitioners were significantly more satisfied with their care, although for adults this difference was not observed in all practices. For children, the mean difference between general and nurse practitioner in percentage satisfaction score was -4.8 (95% confidence interval -6.8 to -2.8), and for adults the differences ranged from -8.8 (-13.6 to -3.9) to 3.8 (-3.3 to 10.8) across the practices. Resolution of symptoms and concerns did not differ between the two groups (odds ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.8) for symptoms and 1.03 (0.8 to 1.4) for concerns). The number of prescriptions issued, investigations ordered, referrals to secondary care, and reattendances were similar between the two groups. However, patients managed by nurse practitioners reported receiving significantly more information about their illnesses and, in all but one practice, their consultations were significantly longer.

Conclusion: This study supports the wider acceptance of the role of nurse practitioners in providing care to patients requesting same day consultations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flow chart showing patient recruitment and follow up
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Gill D, Dawes M, Sharpe M, Mayou R. GP frequent consulters: their prevalence, natural history, and contribution to rising workload. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1856–1857. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marsh GN, Dawes ML. Establishing a minor illness nurse in a busy general practice. BMJ. 1995;310:778–780. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rees M, Kinnersley P. Nurse management of minor illness in general practice. Nursing Times. 1996;92:32–33. - PubMed
    1. Myers P, Lenci B, Sheldon MG. A nurse practitioner as the first point of contact for urgent medical problems in a general practice setting. Fam Pract. 1997;14:492–497. - PubMed
    1. Salisbury CJ, Tettersell MJ. Comparison of the work of a nurse practitioner with that of a general practitioner. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988;38:314–316. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms