Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. CsA Phase 3 Study Group
- PMID: 10768324
- DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00176-1
Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. CsA Phase 3 Study Group
Erratum in
- Ophthalmology 2000 Jul;107(7):1220
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A ([CsA] 0.05% and 0.1% ophthalmic emulsions) to vehicle in patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease.
Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, 6-month, vehicle-controlled.
Participants: A total of 877 patients with defined moderate to severe dry eye disease (292 to 293 in each treatment group).
Methods: Two identical clinical trials; patients were treated twice daily with either CsA, 0.05% or 0.1%, or vehicle. The results of these two trials were combined for analysis.
Efficacy: corneal and interpalpebral dye staining, Schirmer tear test (with and without anesthesia), tear break-up time, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), facial expression, patient subjective rating scale, symptoms of dry eye, investigator's evaluation of global response to treatment, treatment success, and daily use of artificial tears.
Safety: occurrence of adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopy, and blood trough CsA concentrations.
Results: Treatment with CsA, 0.05% or 0.1%, gave significantly (P < or = 0.05) greater improvements than vehicle in two objective signs of dry eye disease (corneal staining and categorized Schirmer values). CsA 0.05% treatment also gave significantly greater improvements (P < 0.05) in three subjective measures of dry eye disease (blurred vision, need for concomitant artificial tears, and the physician's evaluation of global response to treatment). There was no dose-response effect. Both CsA treatments exhibited an excellent safety profile, and there were no significant topical or systemic adverse safety findings.
Conclusions: The novel ophthalmic formulations CsA 0.05% and 0.1% were safe and effective in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease yielding improvements in both objective and subjective measures. Topical CsA represents a new pharmacologically based treatment for dry eye disease that may provide significant patient benefits.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a dose-ranging, randomized trial. The Cyclosporin A Phase 2 Study Group.Ophthalmology. 2000 May;107(5):967-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00035-x. Ophthalmology. 2000. PMID: 10811092 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion versus vehicle in Chinese patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease: an eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Aug;26(4):361-6. doi: 10.1089/jop.2009.0145. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010. PMID: 20698799 Clinical Trial.
-
Phase III safety evaluation of cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic emulsion administered twice daily to dry eye disease patients for up to 3 years.Ophthalmology. 2005 Oct;112(10):1790-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.013. Ophthalmology. 2005. PMID: 16102833 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Efficacy of 0.1% Cyclosporine Solutions in Dry Eye Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2025 May;41(4):199-209. doi: 10.1089/jop.2024.0169. Epub 2025 Feb 10. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2025. PMID: 39929477
-
Efficacy of topical cyclosporine A in optimizing ocular surface and relieving dry eye symptoms after cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int Ophthalmol. 2025 May 17;45(1):201. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03570-x. Int Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40381053
Cited by
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide Ophthalmic Suspension (OPC-12759) in Patients with Dry Eye Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):7155. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227155. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38002767 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Personalized Management of Dry Eye Disease: Beyond Artificial Tears.Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 24;16:3911-3918. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384819. eCollection 2022. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 36452043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical interleukin 1 receptor antagonist for treatment of dry eye disease: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;131(6):715-723. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.195. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23599118 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Topical steroid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit inflammatory cytokine expression on the ocular surface in the botulinum toxin B-induced murine dry eye model.Mol Vis. 2012;18:1803-12. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Mol Vis. 2012. PMID: 22815633 Free PMC article.
-
Cyclosporine immunomodulation retards regeneration of surgically transected corneal nerves.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Feb 13;53(2):732-40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8445. Print 2012 Feb. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012. PMID: 22205605 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical