Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects
- PMID: 10768797
- DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700202
Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects
Abstract
Process evaluation is an important, but infrequently conducted, component of evaluating the impact of health promotion interventions. The process evaluation results from the nine 5-a-Day projects were overviewed. Process evaluation helped explain some of the weaker aspects of program performance, process indicators occasionally declined over time and varied by demographic characteristics, and some process measures were related to mediating variables and program outcomes. Future development of process evaluation must include further development of concepts, more consistent and thorough conduct of process evaluation, appropriate methodological work, and assessment of the relations among the process evaluation components and the program mediators and outcomes. Further development in this area promises refinement in understanding how and why interventions achieve their effects, how best to conduct intervention programs to maximize effects, and enhancement of the internal and external validity of the studies.
Similar articles
-
5-a-day Power Plus: process evaluation of a multicomponent elementary school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption.Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):187-200. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700205. Health Educ Behav. 2000. PMID: 10768800
-
Process of conducting a 5-a-day intervention with high school students: Gimme 5 (Louisiana).Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):201-12. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700206. Health Educ Behav. 2000. PMID: 10768801 Clinical Trial.
-
Uses of process evaluation in the Maryland WIC 5-a-day promotion program.Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):254-63. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700211. Health Educ Behav. 2000. PMID: 10768806
-
Methods, results, and lessons learned from process evaluation of the high 5 school-based nutrition intervention.Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):177-86. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700204. Health Educ Behav. 2000. PMID: 10768799 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: a review.J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19167954 Review.
Cited by
-
Linking implementation process to intervention outcomes in a middle school obesity prevention curriculum, 'Choice, Control and Change'.Health Educ Res. 2015 Apr;30(2):248-61. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv005. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Health Educ Res. 2015. PMID: 25700557 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and their determinants among 11-year-old schoolchildren between 2003 and 2009.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Dec 22;8:141. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-141. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011. PMID: 22192661 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Sexual Transmitted Infection Prevention Program Among University Students in Beira City Central Mozambique: A Study Protocol.Front Reprod Health. 2021 Oct 28;3:745309. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.745309. eCollection 2021. Front Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 36303996 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing Smarter Lunchrooms Makeovers in New York state middle schools: an initial process evaluation.Arch Public Health. 2016 Sep 30;74:41. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0153-9. eCollection 2016. Arch Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27708776 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Organizational Support on Implementation of an Environmental Change Intervention to Improve Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: a Randomized Cross-Over Design.Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1211-1218. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01043-z. Prev Sci. 2019. PMID: 31468247 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources