Is CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms?
- PMID: 10769085
- DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80071-2
Is CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms?
Abstract
The optimal preoperative evaluation of periampullary neoplasms remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of helical computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction in predicting resectability. Between March 1996 and May 1999, a total of 100 patients with periampullary neoplasms were prospectively staged by helical CT and CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction. Vascular involvement was graded from 0 to 4, with grade 0 representing no vascular involvement and grade 4 total encasement of either the superior mesenteric vein or artery. Patients with grade 4 lesions were considered unresectable. Sixty-eight patients underwent surgical exploration with intent to perform a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Forty-four lesions were grade 0, five were grade l, eight were grade 2, and 11 were grade 3. Resectability for grades 0 to 3 was 96%, 100%, 50%, and 9%, respectively, for an overall resectability rate of 76%. Resectability in patients with vascular encroachment (grade 2) is usually determined by the extent of local disease rather than the presence of extrapancreatic disease. Resection is rarely possible in patients with evidence of vascular encasement (grade 3). Additional imaging modalities such as diagnostic laparoscopy are superfluous in patients with no evidence of local vascular involvement on CT angiography (grades 0 and 1) because of the high resectability rate and infrequency of unsuspected distant metastatic deposits.
Similar articles
-
Malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of thin-section dynamic CT in determining resectability.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Sep;159(3):503-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.159.3.1323924. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992. PMID: 1323924
-
State-of-the-art ultrasonography is as accurate as helical computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography for detecting unresectable periampullary cancer.J Ultrasound Med. 2001 May;20(5):481-90. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.5.481. J Ultrasound Med. 2001. PMID: 11345105
-
Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography.J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;8(3):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.12.011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004. PMID: 15019924
-
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 23290296 Review.
-
[Computerized tomography of pancreatic tumors].Tumori. 1999 Jan-Feb;85(1 Suppl 1):S3-5. Tumori. 1999. PMID: 10235071 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement.HPB Surg. 2008;2008:839503. doi: 10.1155/2008/839503. Epub 2009 Mar 11. HPB Surg. 2008. PMID: 19283083 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicodemographic aspect of resectable pancreatic cancer and prognostic factors for resectable cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2012 May 4;10:77. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-77. World J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22559838 Free PMC article.
-
Does multidetector-row CT eliminate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma?Surg Endosc. 2005 Mar;19(3):369-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8712-5. Epub 2004 Dec 23. Surg Endosc. 2005. PMID: 15624058
-
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct;8(5):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s11938-005-0040-x. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 16162303
-
Resectable, borderline, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-"the good, the bad, and the ugly" candidates for surgery?J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Oct;12(5):2450-2460. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2020-slapc-04. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34790406 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical