Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 May;293(2):360-9.

Effects of volatile anesthetics on the direct and indirect protein kinase C-mediated enhancement of alpha1E-type Ca(2+) current in Xenopus oocytes

Affiliations
  • PMID: 10773003

Effects of volatile anesthetics on the direct and indirect protein kinase C-mediated enhancement of alpha1E-type Ca(2+) current in Xenopus oocytes

G L Kamatchi et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 May.

Abstract

The effect of the volatile anesthetics (VAs) halothane (0.59 mM) and isoflurane (0.70 mM) on protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated modulation of alpha1E type of high-voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels was examined in Xenopus oocytes coexpressing m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or 1, 2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DOG) was used to activate PKC directly, whereas indirect activation was induced with acetyl-beta-methylcholine (MCh). The interaction between PKC activators and VAs was examined by perfusing either VA before, during, or after the administration of PMA, DOG, or MCh. In addition, the effect of VAs was studied after the down-regulation of PKC. The application of VAs inhibited Ba(2+) current (I(Ba)), whereas PMA (500 nM), DOG (100 microM), or MCh (1 and 10 microM) markedly potentiated I(Ba). VAs inhibited PMA- or DOG-enhanced I(Ba) to the same extent as seen in controls. The inhibition of I(Ba) induced by VAs was not reversed by PMA or DOG. The administration of VAs in combination with PMA, DOG, or MCh (1 microM) led to the inhibition of I(Ba). MCh (10 microM) counteracted the inhibitory effect of VAs when administered together and reversed the inhibition of I(Ba) produced by VAs. These differences in the responses between PMA and MCh (10 microM) may be based on the involvement of various pools of PKC. It is suggested that VAs act directly at the membrane, because they blocked the membrane-based action of PMA, whereas the receptor-based action of MCh was only partially blocked. It is possible that some PKC isoforms may not be a direct target of VAs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources