Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2000 May;78(5):2334-48.
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76779-8.

The kinetic and physical basis of K(ATP) channel gating: toward a unified molecular understanding

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The kinetic and physical basis of K(ATP) channel gating: toward a unified molecular understanding

D Enkvetchakul et al. Biophys J. 2000 May.

Abstract

K(ATP) channels can be formed from Kir6.2 subunits with or without SUR1. The open-state stability of K(ATP) channels can be increased or reduced by mutations throughout the Kir6.2 subunit, and is increased by application of PIP(2) to the cytoplasmic membrane. Increase of open-state stability is manifested as an increase in the channel open probability in the absence of ATP (Po(zero)) and a correlated decrease in sensitivity to inhibition by ATP. Single channel lifetime analyses were performed on wild-type and I154C mutant channels expressed with, and without, SUR1. Channel kinetics include a single, invariant, open duration; an invariant, brief, closed duration; and longer closed events consisting of a "mixture of exponentials," which are prolonged in ATP and shortened after PIP(2) treatment. The steady-state and kinetic data cannot be accounted for by assuming that ATP binds to the channel and causes a gate to close. Rather, we show that they can be explained by models that assume the following regarding the gating behavior: 1) the channel undergoes ATP-insensitive transitions from the open state to a short closed state (C(f)) and to a longer-lived closed state (C(0)); 2) the C(0) state is destabilized in the presence of SUR1; and 3) ATP can access this C(0) state, stabilizing it and thereby inhibiting macroscopic currents. The effect of PIP(2) and mutations that stabilize the open state is then to shift the equilibrium of the "critical transition" from the open state to the ATP-accessible C(0) state toward the O state, reducing accessibility of the C(0) state, and hence reducing ATP sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 14;275(2):1137-44 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1998 Nov 6;282(5391):1141-4 - PubMed
    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):205-35 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1983 Sep 8-14;305(5930):147-8 - PubMed
    1. Biophys J. 1986 May;49(5):967-80 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources