Comparative bioavailability study of a conventional and two controlled release oral formulations of Tegretol (carbamazepine)--200 mg
- PMID: 10778658
Comparative bioavailability study of a conventional and two controlled release oral formulations of Tegretol (carbamazepine)--200 mg
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the bioquivalence of carbamazepine (CBZ) controlled release formulation A (Tegretol CR, local) vs formulation B (Tegretol CR, Basel) and confirm their controlled release characteristics by comparing with conventional formulation (Tegretol).
Methods: A three-way randomized cross-over bioavailability study was carried out using CBZ 200 mg tablets of conventional and two controlled release formulations in twelve healthy volunteers. Coded plasma samples were analysed for levels of CBZ by HPLC method.
Results: The mean Cmax, Tmax, t1/2 and AUC for formulation A were: 1.67 +/- 0.26 mcg/mL, 24 +/- 0 hr, 47.8 +/- 9.7 hr and 136.7 +/- 25.4 mcg/ml. h; for formulation B were 1.41 +/- 0.31 mcg/mL, 25 +/- 8 hr, 46.9 +/- 7.9 and 119 +/- 32.3 mcg/ml.h and for conventional formulation were 2.43 +/- 3.6 mcg/mL, 9.5 +/- 7.4 hr, 44.6 +/- 9.8 hr and 178.8 +/- 41.9 mcg/ml.h respectively. The fluctuation in plasma concentration within 24 h (peak:trough) were 11.7 +/- 8.14% with conventional formulation as compared to 0% and 1.2 +/- 3.98% with formulation A and B respectively. The mean Tmax for both the controlled release formulations was not statistically significant. On the basis of 90% confidence interval, mean AUC and Cmax values obtained after controlled release formulation A, though statistically significant (P < 0.05) lie well within the prescribed limits of 80-120% as compared to formulation B. Thus both the controlled release formulations were bioequivalent. In comparison to conventional formulation, both controlled release formulations gave lower Cmax, lower AUCs, higher Tmax values, less fluctuation in CBZ plasma concentrations, reduction in ratio of Cmax/AUC values, thus demonstrating controlled release characteristics of the formulation.
Conclusions: Based on the above mentioned parameters both controlled release formulations are bioequivalent and demonstrate controlled release characteristics.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of absorption rate and bioavailability of two brands of carbamazepine.J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 Jul;47(7):699-702. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999. PMID: 10778590 Clinical Trial.
-
In vitro dissolution and in vivo oral absorption of methylphenidate from a bimodal release formulation in healthy volunteers.Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004 Mar;25(2):91-8. doi: 10.1002/bdd.390. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2004. PMID: 14872557 Clinical Trial.
-
Formulation and in vitro/in vivo investigation of carbamazepine controlled-release matrix tablets.Pharmazie. 1999 Feb;54(2):139-41. Pharmazie. 1999. PMID: 10084159 Clinical Trial.
-
Key bioavailability features of a new extended-release formulation of minocycline hydrochloride tablets.Cutis. 2006 Oct;78(4 Suppl):6-10. Cutis. 2006. PMID: 17436824 Review.
-
Pharmacokinetic characterization of controlled-release formulations.Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1990 Apr-Jun;15(2):173-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03190201. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1990. PMID: 2200687 Review.