International comparability of the pathological diagnosis for early cancer of the digestive tract: Munich meeting

Abstract

Large differences have been found between Western and Japanese pathologists' diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia versus early carcinoma for gastric, esophageal. and colorectal epithelial neoplastic lesions. In this study we examined whether differences in experience in gastrointestinal pathology can to some extent explain these differences in diagnostic practice. Three Japanese, one British, and two German pathologists with much experience and one North American pathologist with less experience in routine diagnostic work reviewed 52 microscopic slides: 16 gastric, 24 esophageal, and 12 colorectal biopsy and resection specimens obtained from patients with lesions ranging from early carcinoma to adenoma, dysplasia, and regenerative epithelium. The extent of agreement between the diagnoses of the four individual Western pathologists and the most common Japanese diagnoses was assessed by kappa statistics. For the 16 gastric lesions, a diagnosis of suspected or definite carcinoma was made by the Japanese pathologists in 69%-75% of the slides, by three experienced Western pathologists in 56%-63% (high kappa values: 0.61, 0.64, 0.65), and by the less experienced Western pathologist in only 31% of the slides (low kappa value: 0.10). For the 24 specimens of esophageal squamous lesions, carcinoma in situ and suspected or definite carcinoma were diagnosed by the Japanese in 96%-100% and by the Western pathologists in 63%-88% of the slides (low kappa values: 0.17, 0.25, 0.25, 0.27). For the 12 colorectal lesions, the Japanese diagnosed suspected or definite carcinoma in 58%-83%, whereas all Western pathologists followed the World Health Organization definition of colorectal carcinoma and diagnosed suspected or definite carcinoma in only 0-42% of the slides (kappa values: 0.04, 0.10,0.12, 0.49). In conclusion, there were few differences in diagnoses between experienced Western and Japanese pathologists for gastric lesions but considerable differences for esophageal and colorectal lesions. The differences in the diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia versus early carcinoma between Western and Japanese pathologists found in previous studies may in large part be attributable to differences in experience with regard to gastric neoplasia and to differences in interpretation and nomenclature with regard to esophageal and colorectal neoplasia.