Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Apr;21(4):643-6.

A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis

O B Samuels  1 , G J Joseph, M J Lynn, H A Smith, M I Chimowitz
Affiliations

A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis

O B Samuels et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Apr.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Atherosclerosis of the major intracranial arteries is an important cause of ischemic stroke. We established measurement criteria to assess percent stenosis of a major intracranial artery (carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral, basilar) and determined the interobserver/intraobserver agreements and interclass/intraclass correlations of these measurements.

Methods: We defined percent stenosis of an intracranial artery as follows: percent stenosis = [(1 - (D(stenosis)/D(normal)))] x 100, where D(stenosis) = the diameter of the artery at the site of the most severe stenosis and D(normal) = the diameter of the proximal normal artery. If the proximal segment was diseased, contingency sites were chosen to measure D(normal): distal artery (second choice), feeding artery (third choice). Using a hand-held digital caliper, three neuroradiologists independently measured D(stenosis) and D(normal) of 24 stenotic intracranial arteries. Each observer repeated the readings 4 weeks later. We determined how frequently two observers' measurements of percent stenosis of each of the 24 diseased arteries differed by 10% or less.

Results: Among the three pairs of observers, interobserver agreements were 88% (observer 1 versus observer 2), 79% (observer 1 versus observer 3), 75% (observer 2 versus observer 3) for the first reading and were 75% (observer 1 versus observer 2), 100% (observer 1 versus observer 3), and 71% (observer 2 versus observer 3) for the second reading. Intraobserver agreement for each of the observers was 88%, 83%, and 100%. Interclass correlation was 85% (first reading) and 87% (second reading). Intraclass correlation was 92% (first and second readings combined).

Conclusion: This method shows good interobserver and intraobserver agreements for the measurement of intracranial stenosis of a major artery. If validated in subsequent studies, this method may serve as a standard for the measurement of percent stenosis of an intracranial artery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>fig</sc> 1.
fig 1.
WASID: Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease. The WASID method is used in the multicenter clinical trial assessing the efficacy of warfarin versus aspirin in cases of symptomatic intracranial stenosis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Calculating percent stenosis.
    Schwartz J. Schwartz J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jan;22(1):227. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001. PMID: 11158917 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235-1243 - PubMed
    1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-453 - PubMed
    1. Williama M, Nicoliades A. Predicting the normal dimensions of the internal and external carotid arteries from the diameter of the common carotid. Eur J Vasc Surg 1987;1:91-96 - PubMed
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310 - PubMed
    1. Alterman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;307-317

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources