Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines
- PMID: 10783886
- DOI: 10.1038/35008052
Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines
Abstract
Although there is growing concern that amphibian populations are declining globally, much of the supporting evidence is either anecdotal or derived from short-term studies at small geographical scales. This raises questions not only about the difficulty of detecting temporal trends in populations which are notoriously variable, but also about the validity of inferring global trends from local or regional studies. Here we use data from 936 populations to assess large-scale temporal and spatial variations in amphibian population trends. On a global scale, our results indicate relatively rapid declines from the late 1950s/early 1960s to the late 1960s, followed by a reduced rate of decline to the present. Amphibian population trends during the 1960s were negative in western Europe (including the United Kingdom) and North America, but only the latter populations showed declines from the 1970s to the late 1990s. These results suggest that while large-scale trends show considerable geographical and temporal variability, amphibian populations are in fact declining--and that this decline has been happening for several decades.
Comment in
-
Ecology. Global amphibian population declines.Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):499-500. doi: 10.1038/35087658. Nature. 2001. PMID: 11484041
Similar articles
-
Ecology. Global amphibian population declines.Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):499-500. doi: 10.1038/35087658. Nature. 2001. PMID: 11484041
-
Complex causes of amphibian population declines.Nature. 2001 Apr 5;410(6829):681-4. doi: 10.1038/35070552. Nature. 2001. PMID: 11287952
-
Biogeographic biases in research and their consequences for linking amphibian declines to pollution.Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):465-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00616.x. Conserv Biol. 2007. PMID: 17391196 Review.
-
Citation rate and perceived subject bias in the amphibian-decline literature.Conserv Biol. 2011 Feb;25(1):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01591.x. Epub 2010 Oct 21. Conserv Biol. 2011. PMID: 21251072
-
The complexity of amphibian population declines: understanding the role of cofactors in driving amphibian losses.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Mar;1223:108-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05909.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011. PMID: 21449968 Review.
Cited by
-
Phylogenetically-informed priorities for amphibian conservation.PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043912. Epub 2012 Aug 30. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22952807 Free PMC article.
-
Similar local and landscape processes affect both a common and a rare newt species.PLoS One. 2013 May 3;8(5):e62727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062727. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23658765 Free PMC article.
-
Mobilisation of data to stakeholder communities. Bridging the research-practice gap using a commercial shellfish species model.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 23;15(9):e0238446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238446. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32966298 Free PMC article.
-
Multistage density dependence in an amphibian.Oecologia. 2003 Jun;136(1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1248-x. Epub 2003 Apr 17. Oecologia. 2003. PMID: 12700974
-
Potential component Allee effects and their impact on wetland management in the conservation of endangered anurans.PLoS One. 2010 Apr 9;5(4):e10102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010102. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20404930 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources