Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Apr;26(2):103-7.
doi: 10.1136/jme.26.2.103.

The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures

M T Brown  1
Affiliations

The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures

M T Brown. J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr.

Abstract

In an influential essay entitled Why abortion is wrong, Donald Marquis argues that killing actual persons is wrong because it unjustly deprives victims of their future; that the fetus has a future similar in morally relevant respects to the future lost by competent adult homicide victims, and that, as consequence, abortion is justifiable only in the same circumstances in which killing competent adult human beings is justifiable. The metaphysical claim implicit in the first premise, that actual persons have a future of value, is ambiguous. The Future Like Ours argument (FLO) would be valid if "future of value" were used consistently to mean either "potential future of value" or "self-represented future of value", and FLO would be sound if one or the other interpretation supported both the moral claim and the metaphysical claim, but if, as I argue, any interpretation which makes the argument valid renders it unsound, then FLO must be rejected. Its apparent strength derives from equivocation on the concept of "a future of value".

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Philos. 1990 May;87(5):268-77 - PubMed
    1. J Med Philos. 1985 Aug;10(3):237-51 - PubMed
    1. J Philos. 1990 May;87(5):262-4 - PubMed
    1. J Philos. 1989 Apr;86(4):183-202 - PubMed